Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.atheism > #2075635

Re: Queen of Heaven

Show all headers | View raw

duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:18:45 +0000 (UTC), Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
>> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:33:15 +0000 (UTC), Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 10:11:30 -0700 (PDT), mr.hvac@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> duke 
>>>>>>> What is the name of The Queen of Heaven? 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Mary
>>>>>> -------------
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Why? Mary was simply an underage victim of god's rape by proxy.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mary never had sex.  No rape.
>>> 
>>>> Mary gave herself. Without the permission of her father or betrothed. Mary
>>>> committed sin. 
>>>> During the period of time, no woman had the right to offer herself, even to
>>>> the holy sprite.
>>> 
>>> Nope.  She openly stated that "she does not know man" when Gabriel advised her
>>> that she would bear the son of God.
> 
>> The law which were given to Moses by god ( according the accepted fiction)
>> didn't allow any woman a choice. If the bible is true, then god and Mary
>> both sinned.
> 
> Intelligent people understand that here child is of God and not man.

Well duke you are not intelligent, and you seem to be psychologically
delusional.

There does seem to be this god,,which you claim. Belief in imaginary beings
is a sign of mental illness.

>>>> The law was plain she should have been stoned by her father or her
>>>> betrothed.
>>> 
>>> Everybody thought Joseph was the Father.
> 
>> And if the story is true, then he was.
> 
> No way.  He even said as much.
> 
> Nice way to save face. You do know
>> hat during this period of time, a betrothal was as good as being married?
>> Religion and history seldom match up. Cultural anthropology of that culture
>> and period marriage and betrothal have completely different meanings from
>> the period 150 years later when you babble was actually written.
>> 
> 
> the dukester, American-American
> 
> *****
> "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
> Pope Paul VI
> *****
> 



-- 
Yep it is me, and Carole believes  adding 2+2 can sometimes equal 3 or 5,
and getting wrong answers means you are thinking outside the box.

Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Queen of Heaven The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-12 10:10 -0800
  Re: Queen of Heaven Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-12 20:36 +0000
    Re: Queen of Heaven The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-12 17:51 -0800
      Re: Queen of Heaven Davej <galt_57@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-13 09:49 -0700
  Re: Queen of Heaven Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 00:03 -0800
  Re: Queen of Heaven hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-03-13 01:51 -0800
  Re: Queen of Heaven duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-13 11:43 -0500
    Re: Queen of Heaven mr.hvac@gmail.com - 2016-03-13 10:11 -0700
      Re: Queen of Heaven Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-14 23:33 +0000
        Re: Queen of Heaven duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-15 11:03 -0500
          Re: Queen of Heaven Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-15 19:18 +0000
            Re: Queen of Heaven duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 17:36 -0500
              Re: Queen of Heaven Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 16:03 -0700
                Re: Queen of Heaven duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 16:33 -0500
              Re: Queen of Heaven Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-17 06:03 +0000
                Re: Queen of Heaven duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 16:34 -0500
          Re: Queen of Heaven Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 15:55 -0700
            Re: Queen of Heaven duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 16:41 -0500
      Re: Queen of Heaven John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-03-14 16:52 -0700
        Re: Queen of Heaven duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-15 11:04 -0500
          Re: Queen of Heaven John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-03-16 16:56 -0700
            Re: Queen of Heaven duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 16:42 -0500
          Re: Queen of Heaven "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-17 11:56 +0000
            Re: Queen of Heaven Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-17 18:49 +0000
              Re: Queen of Heaven "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-17 18:57 +0000
                Re: Queen of Heaven Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-17 20:48 +0000
            Re: Queen of Heaven duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 16:43 -0500
      Re: Queen of Heaven Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 15:42 -0700
        Re: Queen of Heaven duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 16:45 -0500
      Re: Queen of Heaven hhyapster@gmail.com - 2016-03-17 04:33 -0700
        Re: Queen of Heaven Bob Officer <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-17 18:49 +0000
    Re: Queen of Heaven John Locke <johnnydemon666@demonmail.com> - 2016-03-13 11:50 -0700
  Re: Queen of Heaven Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-15 08:44 -0500
    Re: Queen of Heaven Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-15 19:35 -0700
      Re: Queen of Heaven Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 08:33 -0700
        Re: Queen of Heaven Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 15:58 -0700

csiph-web