Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.usenet.kooks > #652656
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? |
| Date | 2016-03-14 19:28 -0700 |
| Organization | Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com |
| Message-ID | <984hh0.eu8.17.1@news.alt.net> (permalink) |
| References | <op.yecgn9hntm21m2@benson.localhost> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
(aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
15206-2117 wrote:
> i have some questions that i'm having trouble finding satisfyingly
> correct answers to since if you google something these days, you'll find
> 800
> pages written by internet "experts" that are plenty sure that the 10,000
> pages saying otherwise are a nazi-liberal co-plot while they pretend to
> have
> some sort of expertise. i think i've seen some of these goofs on the
> usernets, come to think of it. ;)
>
> in short; googling stuff is like asking fakey for his "expert"
> opinion, anymore.
>
> would running tubes at a voltage much lower than standard operating
> temperature have any permanent negative effects?
>
> what could potentially explain brand new tubes sounding great for a
> few hours and then audible distortion is heard after 24 hours?
>
>
> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in
>>> time: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) =
>>> 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>
> Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
> *moron*?
>
> "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
>
> it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
> real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
>
> http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
> http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
> "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must
> subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to
> each
> other:"
> http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
>
> http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
>
> on page 2:
>
> ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
> opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
> of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
>
> *COUGH*
> SPNAK!!
>
> -
>
> i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in
> ASCII art if you ask nicely.
> see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
>
> -
>
> snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
>
> - begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
> /*
> HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
>
> http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
>
> place those files in a directory and save this file as
> snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
>
> compiles with:
>
> gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
>
> run with:
>
> ./a.out
>
> enjoy the LULZ ;)
>
> */
> #include <fprecision.h>
> #include <iostream.h>
>
> using namespace std;
>
> int main(){
>
> //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
> //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
>
> float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
> float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
> float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
> ridiculous sinewave mess
> float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
> snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
> float_precision PI;
> PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
>
> // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't
> understand why while(sum < snickerPrediction){
>
> // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
> <db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
> sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
> sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
> (float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
> sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
> (float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
> sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
> +(float_precision(20)*
> float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
> (float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
> +
> (float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
>
> // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
> snickerTurds
> if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
> cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
> }
> t = t+STEP;
> }
> /*
>
> Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
> "Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
> reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
> constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
> volts?"
>
> Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your
> sinewaves never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the
> same
> time. That's how stupid you are.
>
> Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
> "I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
> correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
>
> Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the
> equations and notice a few things about the interactions of their
> frequencies when
> summed.
>
> the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
> figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
> still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he
> has k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
>
> */
> cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time
> t=" << t <<endl;
> }
> - end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
>
> -
>
> Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
> "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
> rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
> <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
>
> -
>
> Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
> Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
> <snicker>
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
>
> on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
> is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
> can go straight to hell*
>
> *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
>
> -
>
> http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
>
> http://cafepress.com/kooktown
>
> http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
>
> -
>
> If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From:
> headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would
> like to
> yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous
> complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
> information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
>
> if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
> downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always
> try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
>
> -
>
> http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
> The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority
> — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of
> subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one.
> Simultaneously it
> presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
> Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their
> homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the
> reason
> many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
> opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
>
> -
>
> Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
>
> $ perl fakeyBot.pl
> FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk
> you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal
> harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
> You> Robert Michael Wolfe
> FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16
> steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and
> cocks,
> Robert. <snicker>
> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
> FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
> Robert> gay sex, mostly...
> FakeyBot> Fag!
>
> (just as useful as the original!)
>
> -
>
> snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie
> pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
> <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
> "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
> largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
> the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users
> were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses,
> then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor
> headers
> while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
> process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
> service. It's not rocket science.
>
> _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum
> how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it
> can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
> distinct impression was that the "anonymity
> research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
> trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was
> a kiddie pr0n network.)
>
> That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
> Onymous was just icing on the cake."
>
> -
>
> Golden Killfile, June 2005
> KOTM, November 2006
> Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
> Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
> Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
> Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
> Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
> Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
> Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
> AUK Mascot, September 2007
>
> =
pigs in blankets
Back to alt.usenet.kooks | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-14 22:17 -0400
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 19:28 -0700
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-14 22:28 -0400
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 19:35 -0700
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-14 23:16 -0400
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-14 19:46 -0700
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 19:53 -0700
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 01:36 -0400
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? binky feel good <waldbyfjulian@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-14 23:46 -0700
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 03:23 -0400
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? binky feel good <julianfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 20:58 -0700
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 00:48 -0400
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? binky feel good <waldbyfjulian@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-14 22:04 -0700
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 01:12 -0400
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-14 22:01 -0700
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 01:04 -0400
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-15 15:03 +0800
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 03:37 -0400
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-15 16:31 +0800
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 05:04 -0400
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-16 02:25 +0800
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 17:49 -0400
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-16 14:15 +0000
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-16 08:41 -0700
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-16 11:45 -0400
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-15 03:35 -0700
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-16 01:52 +0800
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-15 11:25 -0700
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-16 02:33 +0800
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-03-15 10:59 +0100
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 06:17 -0400
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-16 14:20 +0000
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe aka g8dgc) - 2016-03-16 14:12 +0000
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-16 08:40 -0700
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe aka g8dgc) - 2016-03-16 14:08 +0000
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-16 08:31 -0700
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-16 14:03 +0000
Re: do we have any electronic experts here with experience with tubes(valves)? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 11:14 -0400
csiph-web