Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #617201

Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity

Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Date 2023-08-09 10:34 -0700
References <e3565a16-9876-492f-92d7-ced7b8849b88n@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <97daecdf-277e-4348-bc50-e0f5095e404en@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity
From Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Einstein: "If the speed of light depends even in the least on the speed of the light source, then my whole theory of relativity, including the theory of gravitation, is wrong." https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol5-trans/376

The speed of light does depend on the speed of the source

https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-f10f1c25528a4e5edc9bae200640f31c-pjlq

as originally, prior to the preposterous fudge-factoring performed by FitzGerald and Lorentz, proved by the Michelson-Morley experiment:

"Emission theory, also called emitter theory or ballistic theory of light, was a competing theory for the special theory of relativity, explaining the results of the Michelson–Morley experiment of 1887...The name most often associated with emission theory is Isaac Newton. In his corpuscular theory Newton visualized light "corpuscles" being thrown off from hot bodies at a nominal speed of c with respect to the emitting object, and obeying the usual laws of Newtonian mechanics, and we then expect light to be moving towards us with a speed that is offset by the speed of the distant emitter (c ± v)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_theory

Banesh Hoffmann, Einstein's co-author, admits that, originally ("without recourse to contracting lengths, local time, or Lorentz transformations"), the Michelson-Morley experiment was compatible with Newton's variable speed of light, c'=c±v, and incompatible with the constant speed of light, c'=c:

"Moreover, if light consists of particles, as Einstein had suggested in his paper submitted just thirteen weeks before this one, the second principle seems absurd: A stone thrown from a speeding train can do far more damage than one thrown from a train at rest; the speed of the particle is not independent of the motion of the object emitting it. And if we take light to consist of particles and assume that these particles obey Newton's laws, they will conform to Newtonian relativity and thus automatically account for the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment without recourse to contracting lengths, local time, or Lorentz transformations. Yet, as we have seen, Einstein resisted the temptation to account for the null result in terms of particles of light and simple, familiar Newtonian ideas, and introduced as his second postulate something that was more or less obvious when thought of in terms of waves in an ether." Banesh Hoffmann, Relativity and Its Roots, p.92 https://www.amazon.com/Relativity-Its-Roots-Banesh-Hoffmann/dp/0486406768

Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-09 09:17 -0700
  Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-09 10:34 -0700
    Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 17:42 -0700
      Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 20:31 -0700
      Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-09 22:41 -0500
        Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 21:05 -0700
      Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 07:58 -0400
        Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 05:05 -0700
  Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 17:38 -0700
    Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-09 20:40 -0500
    Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-10 08:01 -0400
      Re: Feynman Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 05:05 -0700

csiph-web