Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #6623

Re: cin and scanf which is best for simple input

From "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: cin and scanf which is best for simple input
Date 2011-06-11 12:06 -0500
Message-ID <95hlk9Fpu4U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <a0468c57-e5e2-4076-a27b-008a19b533d8@g28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


"papoupapa" wrote::

<snippage>
> Can someone tell from the code below why scanf solves the issue of a
> number out of
>
> the range and cin seems to read twice a great number such as
> 100000000000 or go into a wild loop if a character or some text is
> entered.
>
> #include "std_lib_facilities.h"
>
> int main()
> {
> int val1 = 0 ;
> int val2 = 0 ;
> int nb_try ;
> bool ok = 0 ;
>
> cout << "\nThis code reads 2 numbers and takes these 2 numbers into
> simple

I suggest you simplify things.  You seem to think cin does something wrong. 
Write a *current* conforming C++ program with cin and only cin which 
exhibits the problem.  Don't complicate things with a second program using 
scanf.  In general, the use of scanf is discouraged.  WRT conforming:
o your include file is not standard.
o your program will not compile.  A simple cout will no longer be accepted.

My wild guess is that your use of "solve" is misguided. 

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

cin and scanf which is best for simple input papoupapa <papoupapoug@gmail.com> - 2011-06-11 03:53 -0700
  Re: cin and scanf which is best for simple input "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2011-06-11 12:06 -0500
    Re: cin and scanf which is best for simple input "Sprechen Sie C++" <spamabuse@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-11 10:50 -0700
  Re: cin and scanf which is best for simple input Kai-Uwe Bux <jkherciueh@gmx.net> - 2011-06-11 20:29 +0200
    Re: cin and scanf which is best for simple input papoupapa <papoupapoug@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 16:25 -0700

csiph-web