Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #15068

Re: Euler's constant

From 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Euler's constant
Date 2011-12-27 17:50 -0800
Organization http://groups.google.com
Message-ID <9230037.1018.1325037005794.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prht13> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <jaddl0$eb6$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1ea747c8-0621-465e-9deb-60306c809007@i8g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> <0.ed7a674fc88bfd9429d2.20111121225322GMT.87pqgl2il9.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <Eulers-number-20111122000909@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <0.1e55531ddd9b14bdc1ae.20111121235118GMT.878vn92fwp.fsf@bsb.me.uk>

Show all headers | View raw


Ben Bacarisse於 2011年11月22日星期二UTC+8上午7時51分18秒寫道:
> r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:
> 
> > Ben Bacarisse <ben.u...@bsb.me.uk> writes:
> >>Lew Pitcher <lpit...@teksavvy.com> writes:
> >>>On Nov 21, 6:45Âam, jacob navia <ja...@spamsink.net> wrote:
> >>>>Le 20/11/11 20:12, 88888 Dihedral a écrit :
> >>>>>PROBLEM 1: COMPUTE THE EULER'S NUMBER UP TO 30 DIGITS AFTER 1.
> >>>>>THE DIGIT REQUIRED SHOULD BE PARAMETER BY THE CALLER!
> >>>>Euler's constant is the limit of the sum when N goes to infinity of:
> >>>>1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + ... 1/N - ln(n)
> >>The location of you reply suggests a connection between the article and
> >>the series directly above it but I can't see a direct connection.  The
> >>last thing this thread needs is more confusion between e and gamma!
> >
> > char const * ec( unsigned const n /* 0 <= n <= 30 */ )
> > { static char result[ 33 ];
> >   strncpy( result, "2.718281828459045235360287471352", n + 2 );
> >   result[ n + 2 ]= 0;
> >   return result; } 
> 
> Good one!  You reply to a post about the potential for confusion between
> the posted series and e by posting a function to compute e.
> 
> Since this seems to be a solution to the OP, could you not have replied
> to that message?
> 
> (Also, I think it's good to mark where you cut text out.  Better still
> is to cut anything not needed for context.  You cut all of Lew's text,
> to which you code *does* relate, but you left mine and Jacob's to which it
> does not.)
> -- 
> Ben.

Don't you work on RSA encoding and decoding ?

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-20 11:12 -0800
  Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-21 08:18 +1300
  Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2011-11-20 20:22 +0100
    Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-20 11:23 -0800
      Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-20 15:03 -0500
        Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-11-20 20:06 +0000
        Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-20 12:13 -0800
          Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-21 09:16 +1300
          Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-20 15:37 -0500
  Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-11-20 14:15 -0700
  Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@teksavvy.com> - 2011-11-20 13:45 -0800
    Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-21 00:44 -0800
      Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-11-21 12:44 +0200
      Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@teksavvy.com> - 2011-11-21 10:41 -0800
    Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-21 00:53 -0800
      Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-24 19:08 +0100
  Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl@earthlink.net> - 2011-11-20 17:32 -0500
    Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-20 14:55 -0800
      Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-20 16:54 -0800
        Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-20 19:35 -0800
          Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-22 00:39 -0800
            Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-22 13:18 -0800
              Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-24 01:50 -0800
  Re: Euler's constant jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-21 12:45 +0100
    Re: Euler's constant Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2011-11-21 13:54 +0100
      Re: Euler's constant jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-21 14:48 +0100
        Re: Euler's constant Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2011-11-21 18:58 +0100
    Re: Euler's constant Markus Wichmann <nullplan@gmx.net> - 2011-11-21 14:10 +0100
      Re: Euler's constant jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-21 15:36 +0100
        Re: Euler's constant 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-21 07:08 -0800
          Re: Euler's constant jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-21 16:16 +0100
            Re: Euler's constant Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-22 00:44 -0800
      Re: Euler's constant Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-21 15:33 +0000
        Re: Euler's constant Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-21 08:50 -0800
          Re: Euler's constant "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-21 17:13 +0000
            Re: Euler's constant James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-21 12:29 -0500
            Re: Euler's constant Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-21 09:28 -0800
              Re: Euler's constant Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-21 23:07 +0000
          Re: Euler's constant Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-11-21 17:29 +0000
            Re: Euler's constant James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-21 12:36 -0500
      Re: Euler's constant Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-21 13:46 -0800
      Re: Euler's constant "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-24 19:08 +0100
        Re: Euler's constant Markus Wichmann <nullplan@gmx.net> - 2011-11-24 20:31 +0100
          Re: Euler's constant "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-27 11:24 +0100
            Re: Euler's constant Markus Wichmann <nullplan@gmx.net> - 2011-11-27 12:09 +0100
          Re: Euler's constant "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-27 13:33 +0100
    Re: Euler's constant Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@teksavvy.com> - 2011-11-21 10:44 -0800
      Re: Euler's constant Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-21 22:53 +0000
        Re: Euler's constant Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-21 23:51 +0000
          Re: Euler's constant 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-22 04:17 -0800
          Re: Euler's constant 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-27 17:50 -0800
            Re: Euler's constant Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-12-28 03:09 +0000
              Re: Euler's constant 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-28 02:52 -0800
                Re: Euler's constant Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-12-28 18:17 +0000
                Re: Euler's constant Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2011-12-28 18:49 +0000
                Re: Euler's constant 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-04 04:44 -0800
                Re: Euler's constant Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-04 12:33 -0600
      Re: Euler's constant 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-21 15:07 -0800
        Re: Euler's constant "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-24 19:08 +0100
  Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-21 04:00 -0800
    Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Kleuskes & Moos <kleuske@somewhere.else.net> - 2011-11-21 12:37 +0000
      Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-21 04:45 -0800
        Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Kleuskes & Moos <kleuske@somewhere.else.net> - 2011-11-21 13:35 +0000
      Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-11-22 00:01 +0200
        Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Kleuskes & Moos <kleuske@somewhere.else.net> - 2011-11-22 11:53 +0000
          Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-22 13:21 -0800
            Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Kleuske <kleuske@nowhere.net> - 2011-11-24 14:50 +0000
  Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-24 14:08 +0100
    Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-24 18:02 +0100
    Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@teksavvy.com> - 2011-11-25 15:31 -0800
      Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-25 17:40 -0800
        Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@teksavvy.com> - 2011-11-25 22:03 -0800
          Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-25 22:43 -0800
            Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Joe Wright <joewwright@comcast.net> - 2011-11-26 02:13 -0500
              Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-26 19:40 -0800
                Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-27 15:35 -0800
            Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-26 20:22 +1300
            Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@teksavvy.com> - 2011-11-26 10:55 -0500
            Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-11-28 08:32 +0000
      Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! superpollo <superpollo@tznvy.pbz> - 2011-11-26 12:11 +0100
        Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@teksavvy.com> - 2011-11-26 10:37 -0500
          Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! superpollo <superpollo@tznvy.pbz> - 2011-11-26 21:48 +0100
          Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-28 01:56 -0800
            Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@teksavvy.com> - 2011-11-28 13:34 -0500
              Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-28 13:45 -0500
                Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@teksavvy.com> - 2011-11-28 13:50 -0500
                Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-28 14:32 -0500
                Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Kleuske <kleuske@nowhere.net> - 2011-11-28 21:16 +0000
              Re: OK. LETS START REAL PROGRAMMING IN C FOR PROBLEMS!!! Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-28 14:59 -0800

csiph-web