Re: Should we censor science?

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Should we censor science?
Date	2017-01-21 21:54 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<8t1dld-ve.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<58756d94$0$42696$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com> <f608442f-ce26-4f90-966c-da56979b815f@googlegroups.com> <d55d713b-71e0-416b-87dd-63096459064d@googlegroups.com> <d6589a86-ac5a-4d9a-ba61-2cca9be334ea@googlegroups.com> <17a6b7bc-2f82-4947-addf-392eb8530859@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote:

> Every Swiss family is "required" to own a machine gun!  I'll bet burglaries are very few too!
> 
> Double-A

Nope.

Every male of military age, with a few exceptions, is a member of the 
reserve and keeps his issue weapon, whatever it may be, and ammunition
at home. 

-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Should we censor science? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-10 18:26 -0500
  Re: Should we censor science? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-01-10 16:16 -0800
  Re: Should we censor science? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 17:44 -0800
    Re: Should we censor science? Kuri Yretin <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2017-01-10 21:24 -0600
      Re: Should we censor science? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 05:50 -0800
    Re: Should we censor science? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-11 17:45 -0500
      Re: Should we censor science? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 17:01 -0800
  Re: Should we censor science? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 14:19 -0800
    Re: Should we censor science? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-01-11 14:53 -0800
    Re: Should we censor science? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 16:14 -0800
      Re: Should we censor science? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-01-12 16:59 -0800
      Re: Should we censor science? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-01-13 01:30 +0000
      Re: Should we censor science? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-12 20:45 -0500
      Re: Should we censor science? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-01-20 10:52 -0800
        Re: Should we censor science? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-01-20 12:13 -0800
        Re: Should we censor science? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-01-21 11:09 -0800
          Re: Should we censor science? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-01-21 21:54 +0000
  Should we censor science? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-01-13 06:39 -0800
    Re: Should we censor science? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-13 17:16 -0500
      Re: Should we censor science? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-01-17 11:18 -0800
        Re: Should we censor science? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-17 17:52 -0500
          Re: Should we censor science? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-01-18 05:06 -0800
            Re: Should we censor science? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-18 18:57 -0500
              Re: Should we censor science? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-01-19 11:25 -0800
                Re: Should we censor science? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-19 16:22 -0500

csiph-web