Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #317011
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.usenet.kooks |
| Subject | Re: Nomination for August KOTM |
| Date | 2015-08-26 14:38 -0700 |
| Organization | Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com |
| Message-ID | <8ni0si.o2u.19.1@news.alt.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <mrgfpm$dmh$3@dont-email.me><d41vpsFsu44U2@mid.individual.net> <mrhlk5$abd$3@dont-email.me><9taqtadk44hmqasn49onqnijliq18onfqm@4ax.com> <mrke4j$prn$2@dont-email.me><eahrtap2bm3tp6kr2l8i34p765dvqv5oca@4ax.com><55ddf01a$0$1776$b1db1813$19ace300@news.astraweb.com><D2033F85.58842%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <mrl2dl$da8$2@dont-email.me> <55de2f20$0$3445$b1db1813$145976f0@news.astraweb.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
vallor wrote: > On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:02:55 -0400, A.M wrote: > >> On 2015-08-26 1:03 PM, Snit wrote: >>> On 8/26/15, 9:58 AM, in article >>> 55ddf01a$0$1776$b1db1813$19ace300@news.astraweb.com, "vallor" >>> <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:56:34 -0600, deep wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:16:44 -0400, "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2015-08-25 11:01 PM, deep wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 08:06:06 -0400, "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2015-08-24 9:47 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:19:07 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> deep wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:48:23 -0400, "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> For the paranoid Linux losers who believe that Microsoft is >>>>>>>>>>>> building a Death Star. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Microsoft isn't a hardware company. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's just Slimer, yet again shilling for his beloved >>>>>>>>>> Microsoft in a most embarrasing manner. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> MS is both a hardware and a software company. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Amazing how Chris Ahlstrom, who got turned on by the sight of a >>>>>>>> USB dongle on a Microsoft Surface tablet, already forgot that >>>>>>>> his dick got erect from Microsoft _hardware_ . These people >>>>>>>> are simply unable to prevent exposing themselves as fools on a >>>>>>>> daily basis. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jesus fucking christ, get a life you idjit. It was fucking >>>>>>> satire. Jeez, humor just isn't any fun when you have to explain >>>>>>> the joke to the stupid people in the room. >>>>>> >>>>>> Says a Linux advocate, part of the gang who considers me calling >>>>>> Linux "a beer brewed by pre-teens in an old, soiled toilet" to >>>>>> be a lie and not a joke. >>>>> >>>>> Actually, it's really creepy. Do you actually know anything >>>>> about the history of Unix and Linux? Why do you hate so much. >>>> >>>> Haters gonna hate. Linux haters gonna hate more -- it's some kind >>>> of Linux derangement syndrome. >>>> >>>> In "Slimer" (A.M., or whatever)'s case, he treats people like >>>> absolute sh*t, then expects them to help him. He also had an >>>> issue with Linux where he a) tried to get help in an advocacy >>>> group _via complaint_, and b) failed to take any reasonable >>>> advice. It's almost as if the guy _wanted_ to fail -- which is a >>>> common troll in an advocacy group. >>>> >>>> The specifics aren't important, but if you are interested: he >>>> complained of video problems on games (that is, full-screen apps) >>>> while using compiz with nouveau. No idea why he insisted on doing >>>> this with compiz without disabling the compositing for full-screen >>>> apps, and no idea why he didn't use the Nvidia-provided drivers. >>>> >>>> At least, that's what I _think_ the story was. I didn't have a >>>> lot of patience for the rapidly-shifting story, full of vitriol and >>>> invective. And I'm not sure, but I think this is the same guy that >>>> thinks running Shadow of Mordor at over 60fps on Linux is somehow >>>> unplayable. >>>> >>>>> If you don't >>>>> like it don't use it. Then piss off. You're a fly in the >>>>> ointment. >>>> >>>> He's taken it upon himself to be as nasty and disgusting a troll as >>>> possible, including an unhealthy obsession with people "eating out >>>> of toilets". He also likes to play a hot/cold game, such as >>>> recently when he said he was going to be "more Christian" and stop >>>> denigrating people -- which lasted maybe three hours. >>>> >>>> He also claimed he was leaving COLA "for good", and that if anybody >>>> wanted to find him (ch'yeah'right), to look in acow-10. I think >>>> that lasted all of 12 hours. >>>> >>>> After taking the gentleman to task for his many sins, he invited >>>> me to plonk him. So, that's where he lives -- at the very bottom >>>> of my Score file, -1000, with what may be his alter-ego. >>>> >>>> I could go on, but I've already spent more time cataloging the >>>> guy's shortcomings than I should have. I will close with this: >>>> there is great irony in that his go-to response for people having >>>> trouble with Windows is "you aren't competent enough to run your >>>> own computer", yet he never will accept responsibility for his own >>>> failures with Linux. >>> >>> Wow... look at that long list of insults as you avoid speaking of >>> technology. > > > (Forgive me, gentle reader, but this "Silver Slimer"/A.M troll has > been responsible for a lot of what ails COLA, so I'm afraid I'll have > to take him apart yet again. Please note followup to a.u.k.) > > (Clearly, "S*it" has no clue what constitutes an "insult". But no > matter, he's not even worth addressing. What I find highly amusing > is this:) > >> >> The worst part is that vallor has exposed himself as being no better >> than the other Linux losers here and probably a much worse liar than >> all of them. > > Well, actually, no -- everything I said is either true, or my opinion. > >> He's completely manipulated my story about the screen tearing >> problems to make me sound like an incompetent idiot. > > No manipulation was necessary for you to sound like that -- we only > need read about your "beer in the toilet" missives, and other assorted > nastiness, to understand where you are coming from. > >> ANYTHING not to >> admit that Linux was at fault. > > Sure. Just like Linux was "at fault" for not handling your wireless > on your laptop out of the box. > > Except, you just admitted it didn't work on Windows either, did it? > > So why do you hold Linux to a different standard than Windows? A > rhetorical question, of course: it's because you are blinded by > incredible cognitive biases. (Anyone viewing your posting history as > "A.M" or "Silver Slimer" can see this for themselves.) > > Regarding your (in)famous "screen-tearing" issue, iirc, the common > thread was that very double-standard that you held -- because it was > pointed out to you that the same issues had been observed in Windows. > Since you wouldn't accept any explanations whatsoever, people > (rightly) labeled you as a troll WHICH YOU LATER ADMITTED. Or to put > this analytically: how can we differentiate between you and someone > who set themselves up for failure? > > Face it: your hate has biased you against not only a set of software > that runs on a computer, but people who run it. You are not only a > hater of Linux (for no reason by your own obvious incompetence), but > a hater of people who choose to run a different operating system. > This is irrational behavior. > > (I'm not surprised, either, that you are no stranger to hate -- you > seem to be in nodding agreement with the racists and bullies that > infest COLA.) > >> I won't be reading Jabba the vallor's posts either from now. >> I'm disgusted by the type of liars Linux attracts. > > Oh sure. You run around telling people that Linux users (which would > include myself, of course) drink toilet water, and you engage in > horrible libels against people you claim to be child molesters, etc., > etc, ad nauseum... but yeah, *you're* the victim. > > Just as you're the victim for posting a link to the image of a former > student as some kind of "conquest" that we can only hope the best for. > Hard to differentiate between that and some kind of greasy usenet > stalker, right? > > Occam's razor just isn't kind to you, is it? > > (But don't worry -- he's not going to read this, because it only > _appears_ he's some kind of stalker. I've got him figured all wrong, > it's all just circumstantial!) > > Again, followup set to a.u.k, where this kook should certainly be > dissected by the experts. I hereby nominate him for KOTM. ok , he gets it he's the new KotM
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-24 16:48 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy deep - 2015-08-24 17:05 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-24 20:02 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 19:47 -0500
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-08-24 21:21 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Tommy Troll <elkabong99@Itroll.org> - 2015-08-24 21:40 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 01:47 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Neil <neil@myplaceofwork.com> - 2015-08-25 09:42 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-25 10:07 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2015-08-25 10:53 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-08-25 09:31 -0500
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:03 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:12 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-25 17:16 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:54 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-25 19:13 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 09:15 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 21:24 -0500
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 02:29 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-25 17:05 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-08-30 19:18 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-30 17:39 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2015-08-31 00:40 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 22:34 -0500
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2015-08-31 02:43 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2015-08-25 10:48 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Neil <neil@myplaceofwork.com> - 2015-08-25 12:45 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy pjp <pjpoirier_is_located@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 14:16 -0300
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2015-08-25 22:35 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-25 17:11 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-08-24 21:19 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 01:47 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-25 08:06 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy deep - 2015-08-25 21:01 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-25 23:25 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-25 22:22 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:49 -0500
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 10:11 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 09:16 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy deep - 2015-08-26 07:56 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 10:13 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-08-26 16:18 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 12:09 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-26 12:47 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy deep - 2015-08-27 09:29 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-08-27 17:38 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-26 10:41 -0500
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 12:11 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-26 12:33 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-26 12:48 -0600
Just plonk the guy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-08-26 16:58 +0000
Re: Just plonk the guy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-26 10:03 -0700
Re: Just plonk the guy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 15:02 -0400
Re: Just plonk the guy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-26 12:12 -0700
Nomination for August KOTM vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-08-26 21:26 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 14:38 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-08-26 21:39 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 15:05 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-08-28 20:01 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-28 15:40 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-08-28 19:58 -0500
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-08-29 01:05 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-08-29 23:17 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 19:24 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-08-28 19:53 -0500
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-08-29 01:06 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-08-29 23:18 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM buZZard <buzz@none.invalid> - 2015-08-31 15:43 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM buZZard <buzz@none.invalid> - 2015-08-31 15:46 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-26 14:41 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-08-26 22:22 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-26 15:38 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-26 15:58 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-26 16:07 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 16:17 -0700
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-08-28 20:01 +0000
Re: Nomination for August KOTM "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 18:35 -0400
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-26 15:40 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-08-26 19:06 -0400
Re: Nomination for August KOTM chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-27 07:19 -0500
Re: Nomination for August KOTM Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-08-28 19:59 +0000
Re: Just plonk the guy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-26 12:49 -0600
Re: Just plonk the guy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-08-26 19:03 +0000
Re: Just plonk the guy JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-08-26 14:30 -0500
Re: Just plonk the guy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-26 13:23 -0700
Re: Just plonk the guy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-27 15:38 -0600
Re: Just plonk the guy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-27 07:04 -0500
Re: Just plonk the guy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-27 15:38 -0600
Re: Just plonk the guy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-28 13:13 -0600
Re: Just plonk the guy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-27 15:37 -0600
Re: Just plonk the guy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 15:00 -0400
Re: Just plonk the guy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-08-26 22:16 +0000
Re: Just plonk the guy "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 15:37 -0700
Re: Just plonk the guy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-26 18:56 -0400
Re: Just plonk the guy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-08-27 01:15 +0200
Re: Just plonk the guy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-08-26 16:27 -0700
Re: Just plonk the guy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-27 15:39 -0600
Re: Just plonk the guy Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-26 16:10 -0700
Re: Just plonk the guy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-08-27 08:33 +0000
Re: KOTM support material "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.sport.borderline.personality.disorder> - 2015-09-01 06:03 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-31 21:09 -0500
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-01 05:51 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-01 18:22 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 12:12 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-01 11:24 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 18:48 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-01 13:36 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 21:56 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-01 22:39 +0100
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-01 21:03 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 08:51 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-01 12:01 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-01 15:46 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-02 13:19 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 09:57 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-01 14:43 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 12:18 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 21:44 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-01 20:30 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 18:04 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-01 21:16 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-01 21:21 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 19:12 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-02 10:01 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-02 05:11 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 08:57 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 10:38 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 14:51 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 15:22 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 08:51 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-02 20:02 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-02 08:24 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 23:48 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-02 09:26 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-02 05:12 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 10:44 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-02 08:01 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 09:17 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-02 07:02 -0700
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-02 07:50 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-09-03 00:56 +0000
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-03 09:10 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-01 20:28 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-25 22:18 -0600
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 22:39 -0500
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2015-08-25 19:11 +0200
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-08-25 17:13 -0400
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 00:07 +0800
Re: Looking at Microsoft's Privacy Policy GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-08-26 12:50 -0600
csiph-web