Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #47006

Re: Hey DildoRider...

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:10:32 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
>Janithor, in <news:nah0vj$pkj$1@news.albasani.net> wrote:
>
>> On 2/22/2016 10:48 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>
>>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
>>> <news:o6qncbdoaqme31oc3ka77g1pdtpii3r669@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
>>> first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
>>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>>>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
>
>>>>>>>>> <http://i.imgur.com/SMRGcQY.png>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Showing the Euler sinewave summation equation plotting 170 volt peak
>>>>>>>>> hot legs translating into 120.208 volt RMS L-N and 208.207 volt L-L,
>>>>>>>>> as is evidenced in 120/208 wye electrical service, the most ubiquitous
>>>>>>>>> commercial electrical service.
>
>>>>>>>> ROFL!  Fakey, you graphed 3 signals of 120v PEAK, not RMS.
>
>>>>>>> WTF? You're retarded. The 170 volt peak sinewaves are in the first
>>>>>>> three equations, the 120.208 volt RMS L-N are the first resultants.
>>>>>>> The fourth equation calculates the 208.207 volt RMS L-L, one of the
>>>>>>> second resultants as a result of summing the first resultants. If you
>>>>>>> like, I can graph the other two 208.207 volt RMS L-L legs to prove you
>>>>>>> wrong even further, but there's little point. I'm right, and you're a
>>>>>>> moron.
>
>>>>>> Look at your retarded graphs, spunky monkey.  They clearly
>>>>>> *peak* at somewhere around +/- 115 to 117v,
>
>>>>> The 120.208 volt RMS L-N sinewaves peak at 120.208 volts, moron. LOL
>
>>>>>> and +/- 205 to 208v.
>
>>>>> The 208.207 volt RMS L-L sinewave peaks at 208.207 volts, moron. LOL
>
>>>> So the uneducable moron thinks RMS and peak voltages are
>>>> identically equal.
>
>>> Yeah, you're the uneducable moron who's already demonstrated his
>>> inability to distinguish between peak-to-peak and RMS when you
>>> blathered that the graph above was actually a graph of 85 volt RMS.
>>>
>>> Shiny Tinfoil Brain wrote:
>>> <MID:rdomcb169mq5csebugqrbj9ganol8je5s1@4ax.com>
>>> "You graphed sines with 85v RMS and 147v RMS amplitude."
>>>
>>> Yeah, you *are* the moron who demonstrated that you don't know the
>>> difference between RMS and peak-to-peak. No idea where you're getting
>>> 147 volts, maybe you're just a moron.
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>
>>>> *sigh*... i tried.  You are hopeless, fakey.
>
>>> You're delusional. Seek immediate psychiatric help.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>
>>>>>> A 120v RMS sinusoid will *peak* at 169.7v.  Duh.
>
>>>> You still don't get it.
>
>>> Moron.
>
>>>> Insert bleatage here:
>>>> ______________________________
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> "...a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle."
>>>>    --Fakey
>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor>
>>> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif>
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
>>> =========================================================
>>> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
>>> See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier
>>> transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in
>>> the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL
>>>
>>> <http://muller.research.engineering.cornell.edu/sites/WEELS/summer06/Fourier%20Transforms-2D.pdf>
>>> 2D Fourier transform of a circularly symmetric function translates to
>>> Bessinc shape in 2-D, translates in 1-D to a sinewave.
>>>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform>
>>> "Still further generalization is possible to functions on groups,
>>> which, besides the original Fourier transform on R or R" (viewed as
>>> groups under addition), notably includes the discrete-time Fourier
>>> transform (DTFT, group = Z), the discrete Fourier transform (DFT,
>>> group = Z mod N) and the Fourier series or *circular* *Fourier*
>>> *transform* (group = S^1, the unit circle ~ closed finite interval
>>> with endpoints identified). The latter is routinely employed to handle
>>> periodic functions."
>>>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_function>
>>> You know, periodic functions... like sinewaves.
>>>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms>
>>> "In mathematics, the Fourier sine and cosine transforms are forms of
>>> the Fourier integral transform that do not use complex numbers."
>>>
>>> Gee.. that *Fourier* *sine* *transform* sure looks familiar, doesn't
>>> it?
>>>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms>
>>> "Relation with complex exponentials:
>>> The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's
>>> Formula"
>>>
>>> Why, that's the exact equation I used to properly graph 170 volt peak
>>> 3-phase, which translates to 120.208 volt RMS L-N and 208.207 volt RMS
>>> L-L. I guess that's why they're called the Euler-Fourier Formulas.
>>>
>>> <http://i.imgur.com/NrZzxlb.png>
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>>> =========================================================
>>>
>>> Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed that Fourier transforms had nothing
>>> to do with the Euler sinewave summation equation? Yeah... yeah you
>>> are.
>>>
>>> Spankard. Moron. LOL
>
>> hi
>
>Hi. I assume you're here to clean up the blood and guts after that
>wicked SPNAK!age I delivered upon the kooks last night. Did you see
>it? I bootfucked them so hard they have bootprints on the inside of
>their teeth.
>
><snicker>


I saw empty hooks dropped and you charging like an Ethiopian running
after a rolling donut.

Back to alt.free.newsservers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-21 07:20 +0100
  Re: Hey DildoRider... Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 15:50 +0800
    Re: Hey DildoRider... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-21 08:04 +0000
    Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 05:49 +0100
      Re: Hey DildoRider... Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:30 +0800
        Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 20:55 +0100
          Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 07:48 +0100
            Re: Hey DildoRider... Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-22 23:16 -0800
              Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 19:10 +0100
                Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 11:55 -0700
                Re: Hey DildoRider... Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-23 10:56 -0800
                Re: Hey DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 16:25 -0800
            Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 22:50 +0100
      Re: Hey DildoRider... Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:42 +0800
        Re: Hey DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 00:52 -0800
          Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 09:02 -0700
            Re: Hey DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 09:30 -0800
              Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 10:39 -0700
        Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 19:35 +0100
          Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 12:00 -0700
          Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 08:20 +0100
            Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 23:05 +0100
              Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 15:34 -0700
                Re: Hey DildoRider... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 19:38 -0500
                Re: Hey DildoRider... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-24 09:45 +0000
            Re: Hey DildoRider... Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 18:51 -0800
        Re: Hey DildoRider... Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 18:52 -0800
  Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-21 02:55 -0700

csiph-web