Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Date | 2011-09-07 20:27 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> |
| Newsgroups | comp.arch |
| Subject | Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for |
| References | <4E655A0D.40509@SPAM.comp-arch.net> <j452o8$6sn$1@news.task.gda.pl> <4E666B47.9020009@bitblocks.com> <4gpjj8-unm.ln1@ntp6.tmsw.no> <Gvl*B-CMt@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> |
| Message-ID | <8mpkj8-41o.ln1@ntp6.tmsw.no> (permalink) |
Thomas Womack wrote: > In article<4gpjj8-unm.ln1@ntp6.tmsw.no>, > Terje Mathisen<"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> wrote: >>> On 9/6/11 5:12 AM, Piotr Wyderski wrote: >>>> Thanks for starting the thread, as bit operations are of vital >>>> importance in my low-level >>>> algorithms. Apart the operations >>>> mentioned previously, I would like to have the following instruction: >>>> >>>> bit_chunk_check(x, n): >>>> >>>> where x is an unsigned integer and n is a positive integer. >>>> The instruction checks whether x contains a chunk of n consecutive >>>> set bits and returns an index of the first/last/some such a chunk. >>>> It is a generalization of bsf/bsr. >> >> I agree that such an instruction would be nice, but probably not >> worthwhile to spend silicon on: >> >> For short runs (< 10-12 bits) lookup tables work well > > What do you put in the lookup table, assuming x is a 64-bit quantity? Sorry, I sort of assumed that in a file system the bitmask will be _significantly_ larger than a single register! I.e. it must be loaded from memory. > I would do > > x01 = x& (x<<1) > x0123 = x01& (x01<<2) > x012 = x01& (x<<2) > x0123456 = x0123& (x012<<4) > bitscan x0123456 > > [that's n-or-more but for file-allocation I thought that was what was > desired; if you want 011111110 then also and in ~(x>>1) and ~(x<<7)] Good idea. Terje -- - <Terje.Mathisen at tmsw.no> "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"
Back to comp.arch | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-09-05 16:23 -0700
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for Mark Thorson <nospam@sonic.net> - 2011-09-05 20:07 -0800
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-09-05 21:25 -0700
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for Andrew Reilly <areilly---@bigpond.net.au> - 2011-09-06 05:09 +0000
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for torbenm@diku.dk (Torben Ægidius Mogensen) - 2011-09-06 10:20 +0200
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-09-06 13:28 +0200
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-09-06 11:29 -0700
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-09-06 11:21 -0700
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2011-09-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-09-10 12:50 -0700
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for torbenm@diku.dk (Torben Ægidius Mogensen) - 2011-09-13 10:34 +0200
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for Mark Thorson <nospam@sonic.net> - 2011-09-07 12:43 -0800
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-09-10 12:27 -0700
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-09-11 21:05 -0700
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2011-09-10 16:57 -0400
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2011-09-10 23:14 -0400
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-09-11 10:16 +0100
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2011-09-11 12:30 -0400
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-09-06 13:25 +0200
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2011-09-05 21:02 -0700
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2011-09-06 14:12 +0200
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for Bakul Shah <usenet@bitblocks.com> - 2011-09-06 11:49 -0700
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-09-07 11:18 +0200
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for Thomas Womack <twomack@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2011-09-07 10:54 +0100
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-09-07 20:27 +0200
Re: Bit Interleaving, Instruction Set Support for MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2011-09-07 12:23 -0700
csiph-web