Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #88430
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: best way to convert a Fortran implied do loop to C++ |
| Date | 2023-01-07 22:46 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87v8ligdyx.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <tpau9h$3e4fi$1@dont-email.me> <87k01yijwp.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <6NguL.537322$GNG9.514912@fx18.iad> <87eds6hv8c.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <871qo6hsrf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> writes:
> To add a bit more detail, I image that formats will be turned into
> run-time objects containing a 'compiled' version of the format
> mini-language. A statement like
>
> WRITE(*, 2) A, X
> 2 FORMAT(I2, F5.2)
It might have made more sense to use a format that could be used by an
external loop like
DO 10 I = 1, 6
WRITE(*, 2) A(I), X(I)
10 END DO
but which while still being sensible would give a different result. For
example, I might have used
2 FORMAT(3(I2, F5.2))
The rest remains the same.
> would turn into
>
> format_2.start();
> format_2.write(UNIT_STAR, A);
> format_2.write(UNIT_STAR, X);
> format_2.end();
>
> where the write method is a templated method that advances an internal
> pointer in the format "list" (it may, in fact, be a cyclic graph). And
>
> WRITE(*,2) (N(I), X(I), I = 1, 6)
>
> would turn into
>
> format_2.start();
> for (int i = 1; i <= 6; i++) {
> format_2.write(STAR, N[i]);
> format_2.write(STAR, X[i]);
> }
> format_2.end();
>
> The member function 'end' should be idempotent, because the write
> function will also call it when the last format specification is used.
>
> I'm sure this is turn out to be way more complicated that it looks to me
> right now, but this feel like the gist of what's needed.
--
Ben.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
best way to convert a Fortran implied do loop to C++ Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2023-01-06 23:00 -0600
Re: best way to convert a Fortran implied do loop to C++ Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-07 12:55 +0000
Re: best way to convert a Fortran implied do loop to C++ Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-01-07 11:07 -0500
Re: best way to convert a Fortran implied do loop to C++ Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-07 21:48 +0000
Re: best way to convert a Fortran implied do loop to C++ Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-07 22:41 +0000
Re: best way to convert a Fortran implied do loop to C++ Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-07 22:46 +0000
Re: best way to convert a Fortran implied do loop to C++ Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2023-01-07 21:29 -0600
Re: best way to convert a Fortran implied do loop to C++ Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2023-01-11 14:16 -0600
csiph-web