Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #46763
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? |
| Date | 2016-04-25 14:23 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87twipjscc.fsf@nightsong.com> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <d7cf3640-40bd-489a-856e-c5441b93d943@googlegroups.com> <nf8r9v$4qn$1@dont-email.me> <d_qdnVnUrr2Cf4XKnZ2dnUU7-KvNnZ2d@supernews.com> <2016Apr24.174508@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <Ka6dnfbt-t8iTIDKnZ2dnUU7-K_NnZ2d@supernews.com> |
Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes: > I have never seen separate tasks for send and receive. But you're > quite right, it doesn't work with full duplex. Interesting, wonder why they did it that way, given how lightweight Forth tasks are. > If you want that, you have to do something different. (This is a case > of the more general rule which is not to over-generalize solutions: > just do the simple thing that you need.) I think it's simpler to use two tasks than use extra logic to keep track of which way the port is going, swap directions, etc. I've always done it with two (not in Forth yet though) and it's quite natural.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-04-06 00:14 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-04-06 00:18 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Martin Nicholas <reply-2016@mgn.org.uk> - 2016-04-06 10:13 +0100
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-04-06 02:32 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 03:25 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-04-06 05:07 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 06:10 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:26 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:38 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-04-06 08:08 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 08:18 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-06-15 21:34 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-06-16 00:43 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 03:54 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-04-06 07:55 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 08:13 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-04-06 10:17 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-04-07 00:17 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 01:27 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-04-07 09:29 +0000
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-04-07 03:27 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 12:11 -0400
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Gerard Sontag <gerardsontag@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 05:39 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 11:45 -0400
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-04-09 00:37 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 14:47 -0400
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-04-06 03:10 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-04-06 03:32 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-04-06 10:48 +0000
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-04-06 04:22 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-04-06 08:32 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-06 11:44 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-04-06 12:43 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 03:31 -0400
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-07 00:40 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2016-04-06 18:16 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-04-18 09:49 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 13:20 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-04-19 04:04 -0500
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 12:11 +0300
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-04-19 05:15 -0500
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 13:31 +0300
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 02:12 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 11:48 -0400
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-04-20 04:07 -0500
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? minforth@arcor.de - 2016-04-20 04:35 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2016-04-20 21:11 +0000
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? minforth@arcor.de - 2016-04-21 05:31 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-04-21 09:22 -0500
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-04-24 15:45 +0000
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-24 11:23 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-06-15 21:29 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-04-24 09:40 -1000
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-04-24 20:18 +0000
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-04-24 14:56 -1000
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-04-25 03:13 -0500
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-25 14:23 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-04-25 14:07 -1000
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-25 21:36 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-04-26 11:32 +0000
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-04-26 08:39 -1000
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-04-26 19:20 +0000
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-04-26 13:09 -1000
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Albert van der Horst <albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-04-27 17:55 +0000
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-04-27 01:54 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-04-26 02:47 -0500
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-26 01:12 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-04-26 04:04 -0500
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-26 02:53 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-04-26 08:23 -0500
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-27 17:49 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-04-28 03:47 -0500
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Albert van der Horst <albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-04-28 11:50 +0000
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-04-29 00:11 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Albert van der Horst <albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-04-26 11:26 +0000
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2016-04-26 07:04 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-04-26 09:29 -0500
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-26 10:47 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2016-04-20 16:04 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-19 10:47 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-04-21 11:54 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? kiy <kiyoneda@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 17:20 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2016-06-04 22:01 +0000
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-06-05 08:53 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-06-05 08:55 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2016-06-06 19:47 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2016-06-07 10:07 +0100
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? endlessboomcapitalism@gmail.com - 2016-06-07 08:43 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-06-19 01:20 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-08-06 04:13 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 13:32 -0400
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-08-06 14:27 -0500
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-08-07 03:46 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 12:31 -0400
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-08-07 03:39 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 12:30 -0400
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-08-09 08:20 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 13:52 -0400
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-08-11 03:41 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 17:56 -0400
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-08-11 22:50 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-11 23:13 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-08-12 03:43 -0500
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-08-11 23:29 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 02:48 -0400
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-08-12 05:17 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 11:11 -0400
csiph-web