Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #51957
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Charles Moore said you can replace all crap with .1% the code |
| Date | 2016-10-17 17:02 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87pomypls2.fsf@nightsong.com> (permalink) |
| References | <9feed3da-dfa7-448a-a42a-fbbf5ced3f43@googlegroups.com> <20161017191434.5ed224af@_> |
Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> writes: > Have you placed his statement into it's appropriate historical > context? What year was this statement made? On an ancient 8-bit > micro-computer without memory and without much hardware to program, > when using threaded-code, this might've once been a realistic > statement,... With plenty of hardware to program in modern computers > and the very large or complex software packages of today, I don't view > his comment as a realistic statement anymore. I took it as being about today's software (or 5 years ago or whenever he gave that talk). And I interpreted it as meaning that given a high-level description of the problem, he can deliver a solution 1% of the size of today's software. An example might be word processing: many perfectly good word processors ran on 32 kilobyte CP/M systems, Apple II's, etc. Microsoft Word today is at least 1000x bigger. Yes it has a lot more crap in it, but that stuff reaches outside the essence of the problem. Myself, I ported Col. G. L. Sicherman's "roff" program to Turbo C and used it for many years on a 4.77 mhz Toshiba laptop, even in the post-Unix era: http://www.cise.ufl.edu/class/cop4600/minix/src/commands/simple/roff.c
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Charles Moore said you can replace all crap with .1% the code polymorph self <jackvanc3@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 06:50 -0700
Re: Charles Moore said you can replace all crap with .1% the code Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2016-10-17 19:14 -0400
Re: Charles Moore said you can replace all crap with .1% the code Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-17 17:02 -0700
Re: Charles Moore said you can replace all crap with .1% the code polymorph self <jackvanc3@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 21:42 -0700
Re: Charles Moore said you can replace all crap with .1% the code polymorph self <jackvanc3@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 21:42 -0700
csiph-web