Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #5267
| From | Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: is it better to learn a couple of platforms/technologies or just one? |
| Date | 2015-02-26 13:56 +0000 |
| Organization | none |
| Message-ID | <87oaogixnt.fsf@ixod.org> (permalink) |
| References | <d95381fe-ebb9-4da0-842a-f7f89b451374@googlegroups.com> <mcku86$2rh$1@dont-email.me> <e151c93e-8d03-4f19-b4b9-79229c2b9774@googlegroups.com> <87y4nkizqa.fsf@ixod.org> <a1d33c92-597d-4f31-bab7-b3c1c60682cc@googlegroups.com> |
fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> writes: (snip) > but if you know 20 various wide-span technologies it costs time counted in years.. Hadnt you find that maybe when sparing this all time and investing in > narrow work wouldnt be better? (snip) In a nutshell: you do end up knowing some things narrowly, but once you know a few different kinds of things, each extra thing is less and less extra effort, so the cost isn't as awful, and in the longer term pays back handsomely. Also, ideas from one can help you see new ways to do things in what you know narrowly. This is how languages develop, indeed: a lot of the "new" things that come to a new version of what you currently use and understand really well, will actually be old things from other languages with which you're already familiar. And, where you have a choice in language, you will be able to choose a good tool for the job. It also helps in staying employed: if you can do a few things, then you can slide a bit in your job toward the things you can see that your employer needs and few of your colleagues can give. (For instance, in a group of mostly Java and JavaScript programmers now, I'm currently increasing my involvement in the C++ stuff that our users are wanting more from us in.) -- Mark
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
is it better to learn a couple of platforms/technologies or just one? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-02-25 05:58 -0800
Re: is it better to learn a couple of platforms/technologies or just one? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-02-25 16:46 +0000
Re: is it better to learn a couple of platforms/technologies or just one? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-02-26 04:31 -0800
Re: is it better to learn a couple of platforms/technologies or just one? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-02-26 12:48 +0000
Re: is it better to learn a couple of platforms/technologies or just one? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-02-26 05:33 -0800
Re: is it better to learn a couple of platforms/technologies or just one? Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> - 2015-02-26 13:47 +0000
Re: is it better to learn a couple of platforms/technologies or just one? Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> - 2015-02-26 13:11 +0000
Re: is it better to learn a couple of platforms/technologies or just one? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-02-26 05:45 -0800
Re: is it better to learn a couple of platforms/technologies or just one? Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> - 2015-02-26 13:56 +0000
Re: is it better to learn a couple of platforms/technologies or just one? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-02-26 06:20 -0800
Re: is it better to learn a couple of platforms/technologies or just one? Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> - 2015-02-26 14:47 +0000
Re: is it better to learn a couple of platforms/technologies or just one? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-02-26 07:17 -0800
Re: is it better to learn a couple of platforms/technologies or just one? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-02-26 07:30 -0800
csiph-web