Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: New directions in C: Default arguments |
| Date | 2015-03-15 11:25 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87mw3eo636.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <me2bmi$62t$2@speranza.aioe.org> <82a53e52-cab0-491c-a593-ef36869419c3@googlegroups.com> |
fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> writes: > W dniu sobota, 14 marca 2015 23:11:39 UTC+1 użytkownik jacob navia napisał: >> 1.6 Default arguments >> 1.6.1 Motivation > > as to default agruments 9as known form c++) i (still) am not sure if > this is/would be good in c <snip> > disadvantage is that it breax the rule of c code being explicit - in > minor way but > ut breaks, for example if i remember ok > you then will nt be sure if > > print() > > is a 0-argument call of some multi argument call with default > arguments - this is disadvantage possibly (probably) disqualifying it > in my eye Why would it disqualify it in C when it does not in other languages? For example, in C++ the meaning of "print();" simply depends on the declaration of print. That might be a "bad idea", but it does not disqualify the notion of default arguments. <snip> -- Ben.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New directions in C: Default arguments jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2015-03-14 23:11 +0100
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-14 18:17 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-03-15 11:25 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-15 07:18 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-15 14:32 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-15 08:30 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-15 09:05 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-15 10:15 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-15 15:03 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-15 22:40 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-15 16:04 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-03-16 08:35 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-03-16 16:45 +0100
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-03-16 11:36 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-03-17 02:09 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-17 12:44 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-03-17 11:07 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-16 11:35 -0500
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-03-16 17:07 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-16 12:40 -0500
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-16 18:12 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-03-16 18:30 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-16 13:52 -0500
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-03-16 19:35 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-16 14:52 -0500
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-03-16 20:27 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-16 19:44 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-03-16 19:55 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-16 20:23 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-03-16 20:53 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-16 14:33 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-03-16 11:44 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-16 13:59 -0500
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-15 01:33 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-15 00:59 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-03-15 23:45 +0100
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-15 16:21 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-03-16 11:41 +0100
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-16 11:13 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-03-16 13:19 +0100
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-16 12:38 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-03-16 13:51 +0100
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-16 13:21 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-03-16 15:12 +0100
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-03-16 14:24 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-03-16 16:09 +0100
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-03-16 18:11 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-03-17 13:23 +0100
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-03-17 12:28 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2015-03-17 13:33 +0100
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-17 08:20 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-17 15:16 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2015-03-16 11:38 +0100
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-16 10:51 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-03-16 13:47 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-03-16 13:20 +0100
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-16 10:43 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-03-17 13:18 +0100
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments bert <bert.hutchings@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-15 08:25 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2015-03-15 18:16 +0100
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Michael Angelo Ravera <maravera@prodigy.net> - 2015-03-16 00:38 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-16 01:03 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-16 09:04 -0500
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Michael Angelo Ravera <maravera@prodigy.net> - 2015-03-17 00:22 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-17 01:08 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-19 01:37 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-03-20 00:45 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-17 22:17 -0500
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Michael Angelo Ravera <maravera@prodigy.net> - 2015-03-18 15:55 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2015-03-16 01:07 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-03-16 08:18 -0700
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-03-16 17:35 +0000
Definitions vs. Prototypes (Was: New directions in C: Default arguments) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-03-16 17:55 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-03-16 20:21 +0000
Re: New directions in C: Default arguments jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2015-03-16 22:44 +0100
csiph-web