Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #27947
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Expression for the global object |
| Date | 2015-05-31 16:41 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87lhg4hhzz.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <5452925.Zt9fTqAOub@PointedEars.de> <87382cj1f5.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <7546503.qSl4iIXIz1@PointedEars.de> <87wpzohk1k.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <1658801.5VaNTTmUhE@PointedEars.de> |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
> Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>
>> Given:
>>
>> 'use strict';
>> console.log((function () { return eval; })()("this") === global);
>> console.log(eval("this") === global);
>> console.log(this === global);
>>
>> nodejs prints:
>>
>> NaN
>> undefined
>> undefined
>
> No, it does not. Because Node.js’s V8 JavaScript is not so badly designed
> that it would print “NaN” or “undefined” as the result of a “===”
> operation.
I edited the code to be more explicit[1] and obviously forgot to edit the
output. It's
true
false
false
>> […]
>>> <http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-10.4.2>
>>
>> Sure, but what does 15.1.2.1.1 (Direct Call to Eval) have to say about
>> it? You can interpret the words there much more readily than I can, and
>> it would seem that at least one implementation has decided that the
>> evaluation of the thunk above is not a "direct call to eval".
>
> We’ll see.
What do you mean by that?
[1] The original code showed access to, NaN, a property of the global
object:
'use strict';
console.log((function () { return eval; })()("this").NaN);
console.log(eval("this").NaN);
console.log(this.NaN);
--
Ben.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Expression for the global object Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-05-31 11:14 +0100
Re: Expression for the global object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-31 15:08 +0200
Re: Expression for the global object Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-05-31 14:56 +0100
Re: Expression for the global object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-31 16:12 +0200
Re: Expression for the global object Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-05-31 15:57 +0100
Re: Expression for the global object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-31 17:33 +0200
Re: Expression for the global object Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-05-31 16:41 +0100
Re: Expression for the global object Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-05-31 16:21 +0200
csiph-web