Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: offsetOf |
| Date | 2011-07-24 18:25 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87k4b7puow.fsf@bazspaz.fatphil.org> (permalink) |
| References | <pan.2011.07.23.20.54.51@mailinator.com> <0.500382f6e840bc7bfed7.20110723230357BST.871uxgu01e.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87y5zoork3.fsf@bazspaz.fatphil.org> <0.4d6e4d5a20933c7e70e3.20110724125050BST.87vcursxr9.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> writes:
> Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
>
> > Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> writes:
> >> Jack Boot <jackboot@mailinator.com> writes:
> <snip>
> >> > struct foo {
> >> > int a[10];
> >> > long b;
> >> > ...
> >> > };
> <snip>
> >> > void
> >> > bar ( struct foo * f )
> >> > {
> <snip>
> >> > }
> <snip>
> >> int *ip = f->a;
> >
> > I have this fetish for wanting addresses to explicitly be addresses
> > (the result of applying the 'address of' operator), so my default
> > would be that which explicitly says 'the address of the first element':
> >
> > int *ip = &f->a[0];
> >
> > I'm consistent with this,
>
> How many of these are there in your code:
>
> const char *digits = &"0123456789"[0];
> ...
> strcmp(&"string"[0], str) == 0
A pair of '"'s is another clear indicator, so precisely zero.
Phil
--
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle." -- Matthew Vernon
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
offsetOf Jack Boot <jackboot@mailinator.com> - 2011-07-23 20:54 +0000
Re: offsetOf Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-24 09:05 +1200
Re: offsetOf Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-07-23 23:03 +0100
Re: offsetOf Jack Boot <jackboot@mailinator.com> - 2011-07-24 10:30 +0000
Re: offsetOf Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-24 22:41 +1200
Re: offsetOf James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-07-24 08:36 -0400
Re: offsetOf jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2011-07-24 14:50 +0000
Re: offsetOf Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-07-24 10:28 -0600
Re: offsetOf Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-07-24 17:30 +0100
Re: offsetOf gordonb.gkpc8@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2011-07-27 08:43 -0500
Re: offsetOf Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-07-24 14:18 +0300
Re: offsetOf Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-07-24 12:50 +0100
Re: offsetOf Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-07-24 18:25 +0300
Re: offsetOf Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-07-23 20:12 -0400
Re: offsetOf "J. J. Farrell" <jjf@bcs.org.uk> - 2011-07-24 01:57 +0100
csiph-web