Re: Reason for segmentation violation

From	Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Reason for segmentation violation
Date	2015-06-17 13:52 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<87k2v2v6o1.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink)
References	(16 earlier) <e8a4c839-1754-4903-a353-ec6f79c445d0@googlegroups.com> <87oakh24u3.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <4da682e4-ed28-4982-9b40-d261657b2b10@googlegroups.com> <87a8vywtmc.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <ceb39bed-8861-440b-a8e0-002fb7a787f2@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

"Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> writes:

> On Wednesday, June 17, 2015 at 11:51:15 AM UTC+2, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> writes:
> [...]
>> > OK.  Well I see different versions of stdint.h are available, and I'm
>> > thinking I want to include as little external code as possible.
>> >
>> > Do you or anyone else here know of an include file I could use that
>> > has just int32_t?  I don't see the project needing any other integer
>> > than that.
>> 
>> The type want is actually int_least32_t (or uint_least32_t).  There is
>> no reason why your program should not compile simply because an exact
>> width type is not available.
>> 
>> But your comparatively narrow range of targets means that for C90 the
>> type to use is just int (or unsigned int).  None of your targets have an
>> int type that is smaller than 32 bits, and I don't think any of them
>> have a wider int type whist at the time having a 32-bit short.
>
> Then I have to ask, what kinds of other targets that have less than 32
> bit ints are there today that are alive (and even growing)?

I don't know -- I'm not an exert on the diversity of C implementations.
There maybe some very low-cost chips with 16-bit ints and a C compiler
but I imagine even these are dwindling.  Someone who knows may chip
in...

> A quick and easy way for the current targets is to pass around
> unsigned shorts then?

I don't get this at all.  What are you asking here?

>> But this brings up another issue.  If you are writing a complete
>> application the internal representation of your data matters only to
>> you, but if you plan to write an XML parsing library (i.e. a parser that
>> other programs can use) then your choice of representation becomes more
>> significant.
>
> Well, the first idea I had for a project was a XML validator which was
> going to be superduper fast using assembly and everything.  Then I
> found that it had to be valid Unicode as well.  Then I found that you
> have to keep track of the state as well to properly validate, and when
> keeping a state, why not keep the entire structure in memory?  And
> when you have it all in memory, it's fairly easy to write it out as
> well when you know your way around the code.
>
> What started as one project grew into another and it keeps growing.  I
> think it would be healthy and smart to avoid scope creep, so yes, it
> would be nice to integrate with other projects at this level instead
> of for example writing a DOM manipulator as well.
>
> So targets and integration are issues I need to figure out.  If
> unsigned shorts are 32 bits on the current targets then that should be
> good enough for now.

I've gone over what I said, and I can't see why you think this.  On the
systems you listed (basically modern POSIX systems and modern Windows
systems) ints are 32-bit.  That's it.  Use int if you insist on old C,
but on modern you could use types like char32_t and some built-in
Unicode support.

The only reason you might use short is on a system where int is too big
and wasteful of space, but I said I know of no systems with ints bigger
than 32-bts where shorts are 32-bits.  I.e. there are no systems where
short will be the type you need.

-- 
Ben.

Thread

Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-10 22:32 -0700
  Re: Reason for segmentation violation Xavier Roche <xroche@free.fr.NOSPAM.invalid> - 2015-06-11 07:52 +0200
    Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-11 07:19 -0700
      Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-11 15:46 +0100
      Re: Reason for segmentation violation Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-06-11 11:23 -0700
        Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-11 12:08 -0700
          Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-11 15:44 -0400
            Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-11 12:55 -0700
              Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-11 16:29 -0400
              Re: Reason for segmentation violation gordonb.h0fbo@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2015-06-17 23:51 -0500
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-17 23:10 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation gordonb.0vo9r@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2015-06-18 03:30 -0500
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-18 02:40 -0700
          Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-11 21:00 +0100
          Re: Reason for segmentation violation Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-06-11 19:58 -0700
            Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-11 23:42 -0700
              Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-12 08:33 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-12 02:36 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-12 11:07 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2015-06-12 04:55 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-12 13:17 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-12 13:32 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-12 13:20 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 23:55 -0700
                Restrictions on inline functions (Was: Reason for segmentation violation) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-14 10:30 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-12 11:10 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2015-06-21 12:46 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-12 08:35 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-12 12:21 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-12 10:48 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-12 19:12 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-06-12 08:49 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-12 09:13 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 08:55 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-12 08:56 -0700
              Re: Reason for segmentation violation glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-06-12 09:41 +0000
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-12 08:29 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 00:03 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-06-14 00:58 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 02:14 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-14 04:26 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 06:29 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-14 15:06 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 07:25 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-14 16:59 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 11:51 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-06-14 16:43 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 14:16 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-06-14 20:35 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-15 01:19 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 03:57 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-06-15 12:26 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 04:47 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-15 15:02 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 07:08 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-06-15 18:56 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 20:09 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-06-16 09:31 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-16 10:09 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-16 02:36 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-16 11:01 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-16 12:37 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-06-16 08:40 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 10:32 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-06-17 07:54 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 05:28 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-06-18 00:34 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 09:13 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-06-19 21:17 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 23:28 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 05:26 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-15 06:20 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-15 14:25 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-15 07:52 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-15 18:29 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-15 11:15 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-06-18 20:41 +0000
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-06-15 18:48 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-15 11:04 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-06-18 20:44 +0000
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-06-19 10:39 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 00:58 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-06-18 20:40 +0000
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-18 17:06 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-18 14:56 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-18 23:04 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-18 18:18 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-06-19 10:26 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 08:57 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-06-15 08:54 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 06:24 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-15 14:32 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 05:43 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-14 23:28 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 16:31 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-15 01:27 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 05:34 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-15 15:00 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 20:37 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-16 09:58 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 10:37 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 17:51 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 21:02 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-16 00:51 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 22:30 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-17 00:35 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2015-06-19 18:51 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 22:40 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 23:23 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 11:07 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 23:54 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-17 10:51 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 03:46 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 04:17 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-17 14:02 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 06:15 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-17 15:34 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 07:58 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-17 16:04 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 08:16 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 14:57 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-18 15:35 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-18 15:44 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-18 08:18 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-18 16:42 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-17 08:19 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-17 16:35 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 08:49 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-17 11:56 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 09:46 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-17 09:14 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation gordonb.446bm@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2015-06-18 01:56 -0500
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 09:54 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-17 09:08 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 16:53 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-22 16:32 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 18:21 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-22 16:33 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 18:20 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-22 13:05 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 19:47 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-17 13:52 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 06:05 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-17 15:39 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 08:02 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-17 16:12 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 10:46 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-17 16:12 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-07-11 08:28 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-06-18 07:32 +1200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 22:02 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-17 13:16 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 22:32 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-23 06:52 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-17 16:16 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 22:44 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-17 17:39 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-18 01:57 -0500
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 09:29 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-17 13:57 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 23:10 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-17 14:22 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 23:41 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-06-18 00:40 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 09:18 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-17 08:52 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 09:27 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-17 11:00 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 07:48 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-06-14 16:53 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-06-14 10:59 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 11:45 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-14 20:01 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 12:40 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-14 21:00 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 13:13 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 13:17 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-14 16:36 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 13:43 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-14 14:50 -0400
              Re: Reason for segmentation violation Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-06-12 03:21 -0700
  Re: Reason for segmentation violation Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-06-10 23:07 -0700

csiph-web