Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #29064
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Scope of "this" variable |
| Date | 2015-12-29 20:47 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87k2nx7zjg.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <87ziwtqc9t.fsf@mithlond.arda> |
Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> writes:
For comment I've duplicated:
Subject: Re: Scope of "this" variable
this is a keyword and not the name of a variable and does not have
scope. But the object to which the keywords refers does changes as
execution contexts are created, entered and exited. As such it feels a
bit like something with scope, but trying to fit it into the model of a
scoped name will just cause confusion.
> Code
>
> var Item = function() {
> this.variable = "variable";
> this.fn1 = function() { return this.variable; };
> this.foo = {
> fn2: function() { return this.variable; }
> };
> };
>
> var item1 = new Item();
> console.log(item1.fn1());
> console.log(item1.foo.fn2());
>
> prints this:
>
> "variable"
> undefined
>
> So function item1.fn1 returns the string "variable" but function
> item1.foo.fn2 returns undefined. The variable "this" somehow disappears
> (or doesn't last long enough) when a function object is created inside
> another object {...}. Why?
When you call a method like item1.foo.fn2, part of the process
establishes a value for 'this'. Calling x.f(...) executes f in a
context in which this refers to x. Here, 'this' will refer to
item1.foo. I think you'll agree that you want that behaviour more often
than not.
> I know a work-around:
>
> var Item = function() {
> this.variable = "variable";
> this.fn1 = function() { return this.variable; };
> var this_object = this;
> this.foo = {
> fn2: function() { return this_object.variable; }
> };
> };
Or you could write
this.foo = {
fn2: (function (outer) {
return function() { return outer.variable; };
})(this)
};
which is slightly neater using ES6's arrow functions:
fn2: (outer => { return () => { return outer.variable; }; })(this)
> But I'd like to understand why the first example works the way it does.
> What's the difference between these to examples?
For the details, you need to read through the language standard. In
particular, section 11.2.3 "Function Calls".
--
Ben.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Scope of "this" variable Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2015-12-29 21:34 +0200
Re: Scope of "this" variable Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-12-29 20:47 +0000
Re: Scope of "this" variable Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2015-12-30 10:57 +0200
Re: Scope of "this" variable Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-29 22:09 +0100
Re: Scope of "this" variable Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-12-29 19:38 -0200
Re: Scope of "this" variable Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-12-29 19:46 -0200
Re: Scope of "this" variable Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-30 00:42 +0100
Re: Scope of "this" variable Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-12-30 00:35 +0100
Re: Scope of "this" variable Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-12-30 02:18 -0200
csiph-web