Re: Reason for segmentation violation

From	Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Reason for segmentation violation
Date	2015-06-12 08:56 -0700
Organization	None to speak of
Message-ID	<87ioashqdb.fsf@kst-u.example.com> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <aehjna51mdp2kdvi22q5em5k979m5gr0j1@4ax.com> <f4c57e09-7ff9-46ad-85ba-e032442a9192@googlegroups.com> <b7hkna9ee41jvrqejb2q9ncta2iuhchsag@4ax.com> <df87df99-138c-4f76-b6fc-02f890dd778b@googlegroups.com> <mle1ua$t29$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:
> On 12/06/15 07:42, Morten W. Petersen wrote:
>> On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 4:58:56 AM UTC+2, Barry Schwarz wrote:
>>
>>> >So, for example having a function which returns long, you're
>>> saying that I don't need to cast an integer (presumably) to long?
>>> This will just automagically work?
>>>
>>> Download a copy of the draft C standard (my copy is called n1570) and
>>> read up on "Conversions".
>>
>> Well, this brings up another interesting point.  I'd like to keep
>> things as simple and portable as possible.  What version of C is
>> it a good idea to aim for, what version of C has features that it
>> would be self-defeating not to make use of?
>
> Well, around here them's fitin' woids, and you'll get a hundred
> different answers, all of them wrong except mine. :-)
>
> The simplest, portablest(tm) "version" of C is the common subset of
> C90, C99, and C11. That's what I use. The features it has that it
> would be self-defeating not to make use of are "it works everywhere"
> and "it breaks nowhere".
[...]

That's certainly a valid approach, but it's not the only one.

I think you said you're using gcc.  gcc has good (but probably not
100% complete) support for C99, and some support for C11.  Each of
the newer standards includes a foreword that lists the features that
were added relative to the previous standard.  If you find those
features useful, you *probably* won't have any problems using them.

As Richard correctly points out, using C99- or C11-specific features
will limit the portability of your code.  In practice, the biggest
issue is likelyi to be Microsoft's compiler, which has good support
for C90 but very poor support for C99.  Some compilers for embedded
systems might also have poor support for later standards.

You'll have to decide, based on your own requirements, whether the
convenience of any newer features is worth the loss of portability.

Drafts of the C99 and C11 standards are available at no cost.

C99: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1256.pdf
C11: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1570.pdf

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Thread

Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-10 22:32 -0700
  Re: Reason for segmentation violation Xavier Roche <xroche@free.fr.NOSPAM.invalid> - 2015-06-11 07:52 +0200
    Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-11 07:19 -0700
      Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-11 15:46 +0100
      Re: Reason for segmentation violation Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-06-11 11:23 -0700
        Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-11 12:08 -0700
          Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-11 15:44 -0400
            Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-11 12:55 -0700
              Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-11 16:29 -0400
              Re: Reason for segmentation violation gordonb.h0fbo@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2015-06-17 23:51 -0500
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-17 23:10 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation gordonb.0vo9r@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2015-06-18 03:30 -0500
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-18 02:40 -0700
          Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-11 21:00 +0100
          Re: Reason for segmentation violation Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-06-11 19:58 -0700
            Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-11 23:42 -0700
              Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-12 08:33 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-12 02:36 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-12 11:07 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2015-06-12 04:55 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-12 13:17 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-12 13:32 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-12 13:20 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 23:55 -0700
                Restrictions on inline functions (Was: Reason for segmentation violation) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-14 10:30 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-12 11:10 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2015-06-21 12:46 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-12 08:35 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-12 12:21 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-12 10:48 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-12 19:12 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-06-12 08:49 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-12 09:13 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-06-13 08:55 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-12 08:56 -0700
              Re: Reason for segmentation violation glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-06-12 09:41 +0000
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-12 08:29 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 00:03 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-06-14 00:58 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 02:14 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-14 04:26 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 06:29 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-14 15:06 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 07:25 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-14 16:59 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 11:51 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-06-14 16:43 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 14:16 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-06-14 20:35 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-15 01:19 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 03:57 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-06-15 12:26 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 04:47 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-15 15:02 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 07:08 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-06-15 18:56 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 20:09 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-06-16 09:31 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-16 10:09 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-16 02:36 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-16 11:01 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-16 12:37 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-06-16 08:40 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 10:32 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-06-17 07:54 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 05:28 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-06-18 00:34 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 09:13 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-06-19 21:17 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 23:28 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 05:26 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-15 06:20 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-15 14:25 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-15 07:52 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-15 18:29 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-15 11:15 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-06-18 20:41 +0000
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-06-15 18:48 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-15 11:04 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-06-18 20:44 +0000
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-06-19 10:39 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 00:58 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-06-18 20:40 +0000
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-18 17:06 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-18 14:56 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-18 23:04 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-18 18:18 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-06-19 10:26 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation David Kleinecke <dkleinecke@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 08:57 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-06-15 08:54 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 06:24 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-15 14:32 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 05:43 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-14 23:28 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 16:31 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-15 01:27 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 05:34 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-15 15:00 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 20:37 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-16 09:58 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 10:37 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 17:51 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 21:02 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-16 00:51 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 22:30 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-17 00:35 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2015-06-19 18:51 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 22:40 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 23:23 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 11:07 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-16 23:54 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-17 10:51 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 03:46 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 04:17 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-17 14:02 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 06:15 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-17 15:34 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 07:58 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-17 16:04 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 08:16 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 14:57 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-18 15:35 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-18 15:44 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-18 08:18 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-18 16:42 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-17 08:19 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-17 16:35 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 08:49 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-17 11:56 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 09:46 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-17 09:14 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation gordonb.446bm@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2015-06-18 01:56 -0500
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 09:54 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-17 09:08 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 16:53 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-22 16:32 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 18:21 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-22 16:33 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 18:20 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-22 13:05 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 19:47 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-17 13:52 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 06:05 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-17 15:39 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 08:02 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-06-17 16:12 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 10:46 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-17 16:12 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-07-11 08:28 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-06-18 07:32 +1200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 22:02 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-17 13:16 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 22:32 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-23 06:52 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-17 16:16 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 22:44 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-17 17:39 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-18 01:57 -0500
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 09:29 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-17 13:57 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 23:10 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-17 14:22 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 23:41 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-06-18 00:40 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-18 09:18 +0200
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-17 08:52 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-17 09:27 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-06-17 11:00 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 07:48 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-06-14 16:53 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-06-14 10:59 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 11:45 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-14 20:01 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 12:40 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-06-14 21:00 +0100
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 13:13 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 13:17 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-14 16:36 -0400
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-06-14 13:43 -0700
                Re: Reason for segmentation violation James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-14 14:50 -0400
              Re: Reason for segmentation violation Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-06-12 03:21 -0700
  Re: Reason for segmentation violation Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-06-10 23:07 -0700

csiph-web