Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Mixed declarations and "code" |
| Date | 2011-05-05 11:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <87hb99atz3.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org> (permalink) |
| References | <ln1v0drp9b.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> |
Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> writes: > The C99 foreword, in the list of major changes between C90 and C99, > mentions "mixed declarations and code". The word "code" is ambiguous > and misleading. The standard doesn't provide a definition for it, > and there are several examples where the word "code" clearly refers > generally to any C source code, including statements, declarations, > and directives. > > Suggestion: Change "mixed declarations and code" to "mixed > declarations and statements". I think that you're about 12 years late to suggest a change to C99. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Mixed declarations and "code" Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-05 11:11 -0700
Re: Mixed declarations and "code" Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-05-05 11:21 -0700
Re: Mixed declarations and "code" Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-05 11:25 -0700
Re: Mixed declarations and "code" Uno <merrilljensen@q.com> - 2011-05-08 01:11 -0700
csiph-web