Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs |
| Date | 2012-05-03 15:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <87havworda.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org> (permalink) |
| References | <61f319f8-323e-41ec-938a-8062d532aa6a@a5g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <lnobq5nj2o.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <c42bba9a-5395-420a-abcb-5bdbc248e780@cl4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <87pqalnffh.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org> <fc405a25-cfaf-4c4d-926d-1084ead31d34@n1g2000vby.googlegroups.com> |
John Reye <jononanon@googlemail.com> writes: > On May 3, 11:05 pm, Ben Pfaff <b...@cs.stanford.edu> wrote: > So if you use a particular union access member... for a particular > union in memory, then you should always access that particular union- > variable, with the same member? > > Is that the only intended use? I believe that is the intention. I couldn't find relevant text in the Rationale. > In particular: is it a misuse of unions, to use them in order to > enable different memory-accesses (word, byte, etc.) to the same > portion of memory???? I have (mis)used it like this in above posts > quite often. > Is that strictly wrong? I think there might be an "out" for accessing any type as an array of unsigned char this way, but I believe that in general this is strictly wrong. I use "memcpy" to achieve a similar effect.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs John Reye <jononanon@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-03 10:04 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-05-03 17:38 +0000
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs John Reye <jononanon@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-03 10:50 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2012-05-03 11:09 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs John Reye <jononanon@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-03 11:18 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2012-05-03 11:24 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs John Reye <jononanon@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-03 11:35 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs John Reye <jononanon@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-03 11:56 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2012-05-03 12:16 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs John Reye <jononanon@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-03 12:20 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-05-03 12:39 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-07 17:51 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs "Joachim Schmitz" <nospam.jojo@schmitz-digital.de> - 2012-05-08 09:10 +0200
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-08 05:31 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-05-03 18:11 +0000
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs John Reye <jononanon@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-03 11:29 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-05-03 19:19 +0000
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs John Reye <jononanon@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-03 13:31 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs John Reye <jononanon@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-03 14:18 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs John Reye <jononanon@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-03 15:20 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-05-04 01:47 +0100
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-07 17:47 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-07 17:45 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-05-08 00:43 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-08 06:17 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-05-03 12:46 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs John Reye <jononanon@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-03 13:35 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2012-05-03 14:05 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs John Reye <jononanon@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-03 14:11 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2012-05-03 15:02 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-07 18:10 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-05-08 00:49 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-05-08 06:37 -0400
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-08 07:49 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-08 07:25 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2012-05-08 09:46 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-05-03 18:24 -0400
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-07 18:24 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-05-03 21:17 +0000
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-07 18:28 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-05-03 15:54 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Old Wolf <oldwolf@inspire.net.nz> - 2012-05-06 22:32 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-05-07 08:26 +0200
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-07 18:31 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-05-03 23:18 +0200
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-05-03 15:58 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-05-04 00:25 -0400
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs John Reye <jononanon@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-03 22:28 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-05-04 07:33 -0400
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-07 19:20 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-07 18:50 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-07 18:42 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-05-07 23:45 -0400
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-07 23:01 -0700
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-05-08 06:28 -0400
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-05-08 06:37 -0400
Re: List of undefined behaviour and other sneeky bugs Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-08 06:19 -0700
csiph-web