Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #234824

Re: compilers and architecture, Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432?

From	Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com>
Newsgroups	alt.folklore.computers
Subject	Re: compilers and architecture, Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432?
Date	2026-06-01 05:08 -1000
Organization	Wheeler&Wheeler
Message-ID	<87h5nm47u1.fsf@localhost> (permalink)
References	<10ve2mc$m8n2$1@dont-email.me> <10veufm$to3f$1@dont-email.me> <10vfdgs$1vl7$1@gal.iecc.com> <87ldczf871.fsf@localhost>

Show all headers | View raw

25oct2006 comp.arch/a.f.c post with archived 08aug81 email pascal
"benchmark" including pascal w/pl.8 backend

6m 30 secs               PERQ (with PERQ's Pascal compiler, of course)
4m 55 secs               68000 with PASCAL/PL.8 compiler at OPT 2
0m 21.5 secs             3033 PASCAL/VS with Optimization
0m 10.5 secs             3033 with PASCAL/PL.8 at OPT 0
0m 5.9 secs              3033 with PASCAL/PL.8 at OPT 3

-- 
virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970

Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? thresh3@fastmail.com (Lev) - 2026-05-30 07:13 +0000
  Re: Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2026-05-30 08:07 -0700
    Re: compilers and architecture, Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2026-05-30 19:24 +0000
      Re: compilers and architecture, Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2026-05-31 13:52 -1000
        Re: compilers and architecture, Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2026-05-31 14:41 -1000
        Re: compilers and architecture, Just How Bad Was The Intel IAPX432? Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2026-06-01 05:08 -1000

csiph-web