Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Pointers: misunderstanding |
| Date | 2015-11-06 17:51 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87fv0jvwxf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <982998f5-5ccc-4bbb-9c57-281252c80a8a@googlegroups.com> <MPG.30a62c02fd25cea07e@news.eternal-september.org> <4b008308-c735-4da8-b946-533409f02cc5@googlegroups.com> <87d1vnxooe.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <046d6331-ce76-4ecf-8b73-dd307ba46a74@googlegroups.com> |
Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> writes: I'll just comment on a couple of things so far not commented on... <snip> > I don't test for zero, though I should have. True. May I skip this for > now? Yes -- you certainly don't want to test for zero. Just remember only to make pointers in the range &array[0] to &array[size_of_the_array] and that the last one does not point to an element of the array -- it points "just after". <snip> >>EEK! temp is a pointer you have not set to point anywhere. *temp is >>therefore what we call "undefined behaviour". But what type is >>*pointer_1? What sort of variable should you use to hold something of >>that type? > >>> *pointer_1 = *pointer_2; >>> *pointer_2 = *temp; >>> } >>> pointer_1++; > > *pointer_1 has a type of a pointer to an integer, as pointer_2 and > temp. No. *pointer_1 has type int. > Do you mean that to declare *temp I need to allocate a memory for it with > malloc? No, you don't need a pointer here at all. You can, I'm sure, come up with a way to swap *pointer_1 and *pointer_2 without using another pointer. -- Ben.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 09:09 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-11-05 17:44 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 00:49 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-11-06 03:01 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 03:09 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-11-05 11:40 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 03:08 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-06 11:33 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-06 08:53 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-11-06 03:16 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 03:30 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 03:32 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 04:58 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-06 09:00 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 09:25 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-11-06 10:07 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-06 12:31 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-11-06 20:08 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 04:59 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-11-06 13:06 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 08:50 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-06 17:00 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 09:17 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-06 17:22 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 09:29 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-11-06 17:53 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 09:22 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-06 17:24 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 09:33 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-06 18:29 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 23:42 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-11-06 20:24 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-11-06 17:51 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 23:37 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-11-07 13:36 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 08:17 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-11-07 12:04 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-06 08:55 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 09:23 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-11-06 03:26 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 23:48 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-11-07 00:35 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 23:48 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-07 12:24 -0800
csiph-web