Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile |
| Date | 2015-08-26 12:37 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87egiq1dri.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <c0acb3a0-aa9d-43aa-b4ae-c00e7622e43a@googlegroups.com> <4m3itahdhql900hjkegsqtflvsajjsd0hp@4ax.com> <b5f85a9f-fbbb-4a6e-9df8-7048a301428e@googlegroups.com> <r21rtat1fbpjsu4l4eru2ae1l0j5336eiu@4ax.com> <863bc31e-b8f9-4f8d-8d43-a99cf48cf849@googlegroups.com> |
Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> writes:
>> > for ( i = 0; i < 3; i++)
>> > {
>> > scanf ("%f", &element);
>> >
>> > is_float = 1;
>> > n = (int) element; /*casting allows to check if
>> > the value entered by the user is a float or
>> > an integer; when I turn element into integer,
>> > then (int) element - element tests the entered value*/
>>
>> The cast does no such thing. What happens differently if you delete
>> the cast?
> Well, as I initialized element as a float, I assumed
> that even if the user enters an integer, the compiler
> will take it as a float X.XX..
You mean "declared" not "initialized". Yes, it will always be treated
as a double (one of the floating point types).
> Therefore, when I cast int to the entered variable element
> and initialize the result to variable n,
You've missed Barry's point: "What happens differently if you delete the
cast?". The answer is nothing. The code is identical with and without
the cast. Assigning a double to an int converts the double by throwing
away the fractional part. The cast does exactly the same thing.
> then when I deduct
> from integer n the float variable element, the result should
> be a number with decimal points (then it is a float),
> or without decimal points (then it is an integer, i.e.
> n - element == 0).
>
>>
>> > if (n - element == 0 || element == 0 )
> /*element == 0 allows to skip zero values*/
>>
>> If element is 0, the second comparison will never even be evaluated.
>> Therefore it is completely useless.
>
> Now I see it. Thank you.
>>
>> WHY is a floating point number with a fractional value of 0 considered
>> invalid?
>
> Mathematically and scientifically it is a float number, but given my
> lack of knowledge, I couldn't yet find the way to test both for
> integers and for floats with zeros after decimal points.
This keeps missing the point. Why do you care? The user enters a
number. You add it to the sum. What is there to test?
I am pretty sure that this reflects some misunderstanding about types
and input, but I can't put my finger on it so I can't correct it.
<snip>
--
Ben.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 04:39 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-08-21 07:54 -0400
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 05:27 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-08-21 10:28 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 11:15 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 05:30 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2015-08-21 12:40 +0000
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 11:16 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-21 07:41 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-08-21 10:56 -0400
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2015-08-21 09:28 -0600
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-08-21 10:02 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 11:21 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-08-21 22:27 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 02:25 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 03:50 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-22 13:18 +0100
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 11:21 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-22 21:55 +0100
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 01:36 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-26 11:24 +0100
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-08-22 17:17 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 01:26 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-08-26 02:27 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 04:21 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-26 12:37 +0100
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-26 13:06 +0100
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-08-26 13:43 +0100
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-26 14:03 +0100
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-26 14:06 +0100
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-09-06 15:14 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-08-26 11:38 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-08-26 11:44 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-08-22 10:49 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 11:16 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 07:19 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-29 15:35 +0100
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 02:11 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-30 12:28 +0100
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-08-30 15:02 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-30 22:36 +0100
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-08-30 16:10 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-08-31 00:14 +0100
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-08-30 19:56 -0700
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-08-29 16:57 +0100
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-08-29 17:37 +0100
Re: Initializing sum to zero wouldn't compile Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 02:14 -0700
csiph-web