Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.privacy.anon-server > #72004

Re: Debian 10 "buster" released

From Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl>
Newsgroups alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.os.linux, comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Debian 10 "buster" released
Date 2019-07-08 20:58 +0200
Organization Decebal Computing
Message-ID <87bly4qroz.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <gof1o0Fh1ddU1@mid.individual.net> <871rz1se99.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <qftt2a$ms3$3@dont-email.me> <87tvbxqtz1.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <qfvu51$oc4$3@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> writes:

> On 7/7/2019 5:56 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> writes:
>>
>>> On 7/7/2019 3:53 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>>> "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On 07/07/2019 20.43, AnonLinuxUser wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Systemd was designed to take care of the deficiencies in init.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not an init system anymore, it does far more and those breaks the
>>>>> Unix philosophy of doing just one thing and then do it really well.
>>>>
>>>> I keep hearing this thing. Why is not everyone mad at Linus also: we
>>>> should have a micro-kernel.
>>>>
>>>> O wait, no: every attempt resulted in failure,
>>>>
>>>
>>> Isn't macOS a micro-kernel.  If so, I can hardly say it is a failure.
>>> Only from a sales approach tho.
>>
>> No, that is a hybrid kernel.
>>
>
> I would like to know the differences.  Always learning something new,
> and it is fun to know.

It is a combination of monolith and micro kernel. Trying to get the
best of both worlds.


By the way I am not sure it is still a hybrid, it is possible that
they went back to monolith. I am not an expert on Mac.

-- 
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof

Back to alt.privacy.anon-server | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Debian 10 "buster" released "Anonymous" <anon@anon.com> - 2019-07-07 07:02 -0500
  Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-07-07 07:27 -0700
    Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "Freenet" <pieer@free.fr> - 2019-07-07 09:36 -0500
    Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-07-07 07:50 -0700
  Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-07 12:43 -0600
    Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-07 19:53 +0100
      Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-07 16:45 -0600
        Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 11:50 +0100
          Re: Debian 10 "buster" released William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-07-08 12:53 +0000
            Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-07-08 16:17 -0400
          Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2019-07-08 09:48 -0400
          Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:19 -0600
            Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 19:17 +0100
              Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 16:06 -0600
          Re: Debian 10 "buster" released vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-07-08 17:47 +0000
    Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2019-07-07 22:07 +0200
      Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-07 21:21 +0100
        Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-07 16:50 -0600
          Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 11:54 +0100
            Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:21 -0600
      Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2019-07-07 23:53 +0200
        Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-07 16:51 -0600
          Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2019-07-08 01:56 +0200
            Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:22 -0600
              Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2019-07-08 20:58 +0200
                Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 16:08 -0600
      Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-07 16:48 -0600
        Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 11:52 +0100
          Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:27 -0600
            Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 19:19 +0100
              Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 16:11 -0600
      Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "Anonymous" <anon@anon.com> - 2019-07-07 20:31 -0500
        Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:29 -0600
          Debian 10 "buster" released Jeff-Relf.Me  @.@ - 2019-07-08 11:29 -0700
            Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "Anonymous" <anon@anon.com> - 2019-07-08 15:17 -0500
            Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 16:12 -0600
            Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2019-07-09 00:24 +0200
              "Antimalware Service Executable" Jeff-Relf.Me  @.@ - 2019-07-08 16:00 -0700
                Re: "Antimalware Service Executable" "Snowden" <Edmail@fromrussiawithlove.net> - 2019-07-08 18:10 -0500
                Re: "Antimalware Service Executable" Ketch <nobody@home.com> - 2019-07-09 07:03 +0000
                Re: "Antimalware Service Executable" Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2019-07-09 03:31 +0200
                Re: "Antimalware Service Executable" Ketch <nobody@home.com> - 2019-07-09 07:03 +0000
                Re: "Antimalware Service Executable" Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-07-09 11:13 -0500
      Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-08 14:12 +0100
        Re: Debian 10 "buster" released "Freenet" <pieer@free.fr> - 2019-07-08 09:05 -0500
        Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 11:33 -0600
    Re: Debian 10 "buster" released Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-07-08 11:05 -0700
      Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-08 16:17 -0600
  Re: Debian 10 "buster" released William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2019-07-17 23:25 +0100
    Re: Debian 10 "buster" released The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-18 01:21 +0100
      Re: Debian 10 "buster" released AnonLinuxUser <Anon@Linuxusers.net> - 2019-07-18 15:47 -0600

csiph-web