Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Pointers: misunderstanding |
| Date | 2015-11-06 17:53 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87a8qrvwu2.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <4b008308-c735-4da8-b946-533409f02cc5@googlegroups.com> <87d1vnxooe.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <046d6331-ce76-4ecf-8b73-dd307ba46a74@googlegroups.com> <n1im7h$c2u$1@dont-email.me> <fa2e5227-3fb9-482c-ab85-3c6751e143c8@googlegroups.com> |
Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> writes: >> > *pointer_1 has a type of a pointer to an integer, as pointer_2 and temp. >> > Do you mean that to declare *temp I need to allocate a memory for it with >> > malloc? >> >> Don't even *think* about that yet. > > Too late :) It's been already part of the lecture (CS50 one) I've listened, > and part of some very simple exercises they offered. Doing problem set I > have to use malloc. If I understood it correctly, but happily forgotten, until > Ben has reminded (though, I am not sure Ben was talking about this) me, > whenever I declare a variable of a pointer type that doesn't point anywhere > yet, I have to allocate a memory for it with malloc. As with temp, > int* temp = malloc(sizeof(int))? I've answered elsewhere, but no. You don't need to do that at all. malloc should not be involved in this exercise. -- Ben.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 09:09 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-11-05 17:44 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 00:49 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-11-06 03:01 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 03:09 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-11-05 11:40 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 03:08 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-06 11:33 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-06 08:53 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-11-06 03:16 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 03:30 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 03:32 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 04:58 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-06 09:00 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 09:25 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-11-06 10:07 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-06 12:31 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-11-06 20:08 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 04:59 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-11-06 13:06 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 08:50 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-06 17:00 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 09:17 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-06 17:22 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 09:29 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-11-06 17:53 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 09:22 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-06 17:24 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 09:33 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-06 18:29 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 23:42 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-11-06 20:24 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-11-06 17:51 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 23:37 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-11-07 13:36 +0000
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 08:17 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-11-07 12:04 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-06 08:55 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 09:23 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2015-11-06 03:26 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 23:48 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-11-07 00:35 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Alla _ <modelling.data@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 23:48 -0800
Re: Pointers: misunderstanding Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-07 12:24 -0800
csiph-web