Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #7872

Re: A C without void*

Show all headers | View raw

"MikeP" <mp011011@some.org> writes:

> Spiros Bousbouras wrote:
> > Why does C have void* ? Imagine a C' where the functionality that
> > void* provides would be provided instead by unsigned char* plus what
> > unsigned char* usually does. In what way would C' be inferior to C ?''
> 
> Well you fucked up that question royally. 

Can anyone who uses GNUS remind me how to view full headers of a post?
(Ctrl-H A, Ctrl-H M, etc. were no help, obviosuly I'm looking for the
wrong keywords).

Of course I could just killfile the guy from his posting name, but I 
always like to see if there are additional clues in the headers for 
creating a broader filter that might be more useful. Idiots are prone 
to morph, for example, and anonymisers have a notoriously low SNR.

I used to know how to view them, but after taking a year off usenet,
I've forgotten all my motor-memory keystrokes (and the C-x C-c that 
I've learnt from my current mailer makes GNUS quite a fun experience!).

Cheers,
Phil
-- 
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle." -- Matthew Vernon

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: A C without void* "MikeP" <mp011011@some.org> - 2011-07-05 00:29 -0500
  Re: A C without void* Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-05 08:46 -0700
  Re: A C without void* Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-07-07 22:11 +0300
    Re: A C without void* James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-07-07 22:46 -0400
    Re: A C without void* Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-07-09 02:58 +0100
    Re: A C without void* Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2011-07-09 07:18 +0100
      Re: A C without void* Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-07-10 04:39 +0300

csiph-web