Re: BASIC is 50

From	Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net>
Newsgroups	comp.misc
Subject	Re: BASIC is 50
Date	2014-05-12 16:06 +0300
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<877g5rdu3t.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <5360da8d$0$17144$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> <ljr6f8$6mn$1@dont-email.me> <53616180$0$59815$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com> <gknav.371282$sa2.196137@fx33.am4> <5370c119$0$59769$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Rich <rich@example.com>:

> Reading the whole is better, but here is a small quote:
>
>    "For example, using the Java or C double datatype, 0.1 × 8 (a
>    binary multiple) gives the result
>    0.8000000000000000444089209850062616169452667236328125 but 0.1
>    added to itself 8 times gives the different answer
>    0.79999999999999993338661852249060757458209991455078125. The two
>    results would not compare equal, and further, if these values are
>    multiplied by ten and rounded to the nearest integer below (the
>    "floor" function), the result will be 8 in one case and 7 in the
>    other."

Why would you round like that? The age-old technique is floor(x + 0.5).


Marko

Thread

BASIC is 50 Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-04-30 09:34 +0000
  Re: BASIC is 50 Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2014-04-30 03:42 -0700
    Re: BASIC is 50 Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-04-30 10:46 +0000
      Re: BASIC is 50 Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-04-30 12:03 +0000
  Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-04-30 11:12 +0000
    Re: BASIC is 50 scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-04-30 15:56 +0000
      Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-04-30 20:41 +0000
        Re: BASIC is 50 Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-04-30 18:38 -0600
          Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-01 02:38 +0000
            Re: BASIC is 50 Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-04-30 22:50 -0600
      Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-04-30 20:48 +0000
        Re: BASIC is 50 Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-05-02 09:27 +0100
          Re: BASIC is 50 Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-02 09:50 +0100
        Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-07 10:48 +0100
          Re: BASIC is 50 Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-05-07 10:57 +0100
          Re: BASIC is 50 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-07 11:20 +0000
            Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-07 13:14 +0100
              Re: BASIC is 50 Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-07 16:05 +0300
                Re: BASIC is 50 Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-08 18:06 +0200
                Re: BASIC is 50 Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-08 20:17 +0300
              Re: BASIC is 50 "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 16:08 +0100
                Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-07 18:38 +0100
                Re: BASIC is 50 "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-05-07 19:09 +0100
                Re: BASIC is 50 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-05-07 19:08 +0000
              Re: BASIC is 50 greymausg@mail.com - 2014-05-08 10:15 +0000
                Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-08 11:38 +0100
              Re: BASIC is 50 Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-08 17:55 +0200
          Re: BASIC is 50 Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-08 17:44 +0200
          Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-12 12:39 +0000
            Re: BASIC is 50 Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-12 16:06 +0300
            Re: BASIC is 50 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-05-12 22:48 +0100
              Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-13 12:03 +0000
                Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-13 13:23 +0100
                Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-13 16:22 +0000
                Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-13 19:42 +0100
                Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-13 19:49 +0100
                Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-14 01:09 +0000
                Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-14 09:51 +0100
                Re: BASIC is 50 bde@besplex.bde.org (Bruce Evans) - 2014-05-14 10:36 +0000
                Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-14 12:58 +0100
                Re: BASIC is 50 bde@besplex.bde.org (Bruce Evans) - 2014-05-14 16:13 +0000
                Re: BASIC is 50 "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-14 19:24 +0100
                Re: BASIC is 50 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-05-13 15:50 +0100
    Re: BASIC is 50 Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-05-01 02:50 +0100
    Re: BASIC is 50 David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-01 09:06 +0100
      Re: BASIC is 50 Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-05-01 09:56 +0000
      Re: BASIC is 50 Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-01 10:25 +0000
        Re: BASIC is 50 Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-05-01 16:43 +0300
          Re: BASIC is 50 Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2014-05-01 18:03 +0000
          Re: BASIC is 50 Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-01 21:35 +0000
        Re: BASIC is 50 Rob <monst.oorzudo@ntlworld.com> - 2014-05-01 22:41 +0100
          Re: BASIC is 50 David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-02 09:26 +0100
            Re: BASIC is 50 Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-02 10:46 +0100
            Re: BASIC is 50 Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-05-02 23:11 +0100
  Re: BASIC is 50 Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-04-30 17:51 +0300
  Re: BASIC is 50 Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-14 17:40 +0100

csiph-web