Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: length of strings in a two dimensional array |
| Date | 2011-04-20 10:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8762q8rgvt.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org> (permalink) |
| References | <1f5669eb-6ab6-4dd7-a9e4-486134774dc0@r4g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <bmcsq69j3rrg74953159rbrglg7kif9iu6@4ax.com> <b5f8b3cf-0463-4770-85b6-91614d4037b3@cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <iomecv$8ot$1@dont-email.me> <248e0773-734b-441d-b33b-de81217cdd46@z31g2000vbs.googlegroups.com> |
"dr.oktopus" <blindwilly@freeonline.zzn.com> writes: >> > Using something like: >> >> > #define message_lo "this is lowercase" >> > #define message_hi "this is uppercase" >> >> > prevents me to use the sizeof operator, so we return at the start >> > point. >> >> With the above #defines, nothing prevents you from using the expression >> "sizeof message_lo"; > > Is guaranteed that C will not apply that sizeof as if it would be > a sizeof(char *)? It's guaranteed. A literal string has type "(unmodifiable) array of char". It is only converted to a pointer in the usual contexts where arrays are converted to pointers. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
length of strings in a two dimensional array "dr.oktopus" <blindwilly@freeonline.zzn.com> - 2011-04-19 13:54 -0700
Re: length of strings in a two dimensional array "Morris Keesan" <mkeesan@post.harvard.edu> - 2011-04-19 17:07 -0400
Re: length of strings in a two dimensional array Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2011-04-19 18:34 -0700
Re: length of strings in a two dimensional array "dr.oktopus" <blindwilly@freeonline.zzn.com> - 2011-04-20 02:09 -0700
Re: length of strings in a two dimensional array James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-04-20 07:00 -0400
Re: length of strings in a two dimensional array Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-20 23:13 +1200
Re: length of strings in a two dimensional array James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-04-20 07:38 -0400
Re: length of strings in a two dimensional array "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2011-04-20 09:25 -0600
Re: length of strings in a two dimensional array "dr.oktopus" <blindwilly@freeonline.zzn.com> - 2011-04-20 09:51 -0700
Re: length of strings in a two dimensional array Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-04-20 10:07 -0700
Re: length of strings in a two dimensional array James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-04-20 19:57 -0400
Re: length of strings in a two dimensional array Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-04-20 08:12 -0400
Re: length of strings in a two dimensional array "dr.oktopus" <blindwilly@freeonline.zzn.com> - 2011-04-20 09:46 -0700
Re: length of strings in a two dimensional array Peter Nilsson <airia@acay.com.au> - 2011-04-20 15:11 -0700
Re: length of strings in a two dimensional array "dr.oktopus" <blindwilly@freeonline.zzn.com> - 2011-04-21 02:26 -0700
Re: length of strings in a two dimensional array Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-04-21 07:44 -0400
Re: length of strings in a two dimensional array Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-04-20 22:26 -0400
csiph-web