Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #25494

Re: Request for source code review

From Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Request for source code review
Date 2012-08-30 09:44 +0530
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <876281ggnb.fsf@panda.goosenet.in> (permalink)
References <87bohty09k.fsf@panda.goosenet.in> <0.d7d1accdadfb8b47e6d9.20120829222744BST.87ipc1e6cv.fsf@bsb.me.uk>

Show all headers | View raw


Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> writes:
| I think it's good.
 Thank you.
 
| By the way, it's easier to comment on posted code though I know you were
| probably worried about posting a long listing here.  It is longish, but
| I think it's probably within the length where people are more likely to
| read it when posted directly than when it's referenced on a sharing site.
 I had originally wanted to post the entire source here, but I had no
 idea about the acceptable source post length.

 I will keep your advice in mind, though.
 
| Anyway, I have only a few of remarks:
| * Why have the function 'd' in file on its own?  If it's going to be used
| a lot other programs, it needs a much better name than 'd', and if it
| isn't, why not just put it where it is used?  (Either way, 'd' is not
| really a good name for it -- too sort whatever the use).
 Makes sense.
 
| * It's widely regarded a good style to put parentheses round all
| macro bodies that are anything more the a constant or an identifier.
| One day you'll forget that you wrote
|   #define LIMIT    (MAXSUM) + 1
|
| and you'll write LIMIT * 2.
 I can see now how my current scheme could lead to nasty macroexpansion
 bugs when used carelessly.

| * I'd just initialise my array where it is declared:
|
|   int sums[LIMIT] = {0};
|
| rather than have an initsums function.
 I had forgotten about zero-initialization for arrays.  That function of
 mine seems highly redundant now.
 
| * Finally, I prefer to avoid having extra variables.  Rather than:
|
|     int sum;                    /* Sum of the dice. */
|     int i;
|
|     for (i = 0; i < maxrolls; i++) {
|         sum = sumdice (NDICE);
|         ++sums [sum];
|     }
|
| I'd write:
|
|     for (i = 0; i < maxrolls; i++)
|         ++sums[ sumdice(NDICE) ];
|
| For one thing, after a while, you run out of good names for them.
| That's already happening here: 'sumdice' is a better name than 'sum'
| i.e. the function name says more than the extra variable does.
 Sounds good.
 
| Anyway, it's good.  Don't let my nit-picking get you down.
 I think your remarks have made the code clearer to me.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-30 00:49 +0530
  Re: Request for source code review Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-08-29 19:43 +0000
    Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-30 18:46 +0530
  Re: Request for source code review Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-08-29 22:27 +0100
    Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-30 09:44 +0530
    Re: Request for source code review Seungbeom Kim <musiphil@bawi.org> - 2012-09-07 17:31 -0700
      Re: Request for source code review Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-08 12:41 +1200
      Re: Request for source code review Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-08 04:06 +0100
        Re: Request for source code review 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-07 23:50 -0700
          Re: Request for source code review Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-08 12:28 +0100
  Re: Request for source code review "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-08-29 22:58 +0100
    Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-30 09:48 +0530
  Re: Request for source code review Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-29 18:55 -0700
    Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-30 10:06 +0530
      Re: Request for source code review lovecreatesbeauty <lovecreatesbeauty@gmail.com> - 2012-08-29 21:59 -0700
        Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-30 18:51 +0530
      Re: Request for source code review Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-08-30 13:44 +0100
        Re: Request for source code review lovecreatesbeauty <lovecreatesbeauty@gmail.com> - 2012-09-12 03:24 -0700
    Re: Request for source code review Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-30 17:04 +1200
      Re: Request for source code review James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-08-30 07:43 -0400
        Re: Request for source code review Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-31 20:43 +1200
          Re: Request for source code review Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-08-31 21:18 -0500
            Re: Request for source code review James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-09-01 20:34 -0400
              Re: Request for source code review Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-09-01 20:45 -0500
                Re: Request for source code review Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-02 15:11 +1200
                Re: Request for source code review Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2012-09-01 23:43 -0500
      Re: Request for source code review Adrian Ratnapala <raka@scooter.fritz.box> - 2012-09-01 07:40 +0000
  Re: Request for source code review Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-08-30 05:10 -0700
    Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-30 19:14 +0530
      Re: Request for source code review Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-08-30 16:42 +0100
  Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-31 19:44 +0530
  Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-08-31 20:03 +0530
    Re: Request for source code review Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-31 13:34 -0700
      Re: Request for source code review Adrian Ratnapala <raka@scooter.fritz.box> - 2012-09-01 07:49 +0000
        Re: Request for source code review Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-01 02:53 -0700
    Re: Request for source code review pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-08-31 21:15 -0400
  Re: Request for source code review Jan Kuiken <jan.kuiken@quicknet.nl> - 2012-08-31 19:55 +0200
    Re: Request for source code review Udyant Wig <udyantw@gmail.com> - 2012-09-02 15:39 +0530
      Re: Request for source code review Jan Kuiken <jan.kuiken@quicknet.nl> - 2012-09-02 19:57 +0200

csiph-web