Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #160101
| From | Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? |
| Date | 2021-04-14 10:31 -0700 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <875z0o3h8v.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink) |
| References | <a21102b2-7c82-40d9-9549-c10a1b77247en@googlegroups.com> <s566dc$knc$1@dont-email.me> <b1c7d8c0-c837-4b68-9867-b1f8ff5ab06fn@googlegroups.com> <s56jl6$iaf$1@dont-email.me> |
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
[...]
> However, there is specific point in 6.5.2.1p10 covering function calls:
>
> """
> There is a sequence point after the evaluations of the function
> designator and the actual arguments but before the actual call. Every
> evaluation in the calling function (including other function calls)
> that is not otherwise specifically sequenced before or after the
> execution of the body of the called function is indeterminately
> sequenced with respect to the execution of the called function. 96)
> """
> """
> 96) In other words, function executions do not “interleave” with each other.
> """
>
> So the order of the ferror() and fclose() calls is not determined, but
> they will not interleave as I thought they could.
Some day I'll learn to read the whole thread before posting.
<Aragorn>But it is not this day!</Aragorn>
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
Working, but not speaking, for Philips Healthcare
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Oğuz <oguzismailuysal@gmail.com> - 2021-04-13 22:43 -0700
Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@delq.com> - 2021-04-14 00:04 -0700
Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-14 09:42 +0200
Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Oğuz <oguzismailuysal@gmail.com> - 2021-04-14 00:51 -0700
Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-14 11:25 +0200
Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-04-14 03:27 -0700
Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-14 13:28 +0200
Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-04-14 10:31 -0700
Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-14 19:40 +0200
Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-04-14 10:26 -0700
Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-04-14 07:22 -0400
Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-04-14 07:54 -0700
Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-04-14 14:23 -0400
Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-04-14 14:33 +0000
Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-04-14 13:15 -0400
Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-04-14 08:06 -0700
Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2021-04-14 10:34 -0600
Re: Which side of bitwise OR is evaluated first? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-07-11 00:24 -0700
csiph-web