Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #135572

Re: Forth on ARM64

From Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Forth on ARM64
Date 2026-09-05 15:49 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <875x0jl3f6.fsf@nightsong.com> (permalink)
References <117cmk0$1st8p$1@paganini.bofh.team> <20260904073311.00003526@tin.it> <nnd$3b980ba8$57c49a3b@950882b8bd21bd72> <117fcl7$26t23$1@paganini.bofh.team>

Show all headers | View raw

antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) writes:
> there are only 11 registers not touched by C.

I missed some parts of this thread but why would a C compiler leave 11
registers untouched?  Usually a compiler with register allocation will
use all the registers, unless you ask it to reserve some for other
purposes.

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Forth on ARM64 antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-09-03 20:51 +0000
  Re: Forth on ARM64 peter <peter.noreply@tin.it> - 2026-09-04 07:33 +0200
    Re: Forth on ARM64 albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2026-09-04 10:21 +0200
      Re: Forth on ARM64 antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-09-04 21:19 +0000
        Re: Forth on ARM64 peter <peter.noreply@tin.it> - 2026-09-04 23:51 +0200
        Re: Forth on ARM64 albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2026-09-05 13:11 +0200
        Re: Forth on ARM64 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2026-09-05 15:49 -0700
          Re: Forth on ARM64 antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-09-05 23:39 +0000
    Re: Forth on ARM64 antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-09-04 22:25 +0000
      Re: Forth on ARM64 peter <peter.noreply@tin.it> - 2026-09-05 09:54 +0200

csiph-web