Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #41600

Re: c prog -plz explain

Show all headers | View raw

Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> writes:

> On 2014-03-11, SAHIL MAHLA <sahilmehla@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Pitcher ,
>>
>> It's because we are typecasting i's address into a double* and then passing
>> it to the incre() function. I know there is some issue with the typecasting
>> itself.Passing like this is illegal ...is it???.....and my apologies for the
>> silly abbrevations. 
>
> Never mind the type casting being illega.
>
> Have you considerd that the type double and the type int do not even have the
> same size? (They might, but often they do not.  A common size for int is 32
> bits nowadays, and a double is often 64 bits.)
>
> What do you think happens when you pass a pointer to 32 bytes of storage
> to a function which treats that as 64 bytes of storage?
> Of course, that function stomps on memory outside of the object.
>
> The code could well crash. What if incme overwrites the return address on the
> stack, so that when it tries to return back to main, it jumps into nowhere
> land, resulting in an access violation or illegal instruction trap or something
> of that sort?
>
> Listen, you better start replacing "I feel" with "I think", or find another
> hobby.


Don't give up your day job Kaz. Your insightful, friendly and, above
all, helpful & professional input would be missed here.

There was a time these groups were here to help and correct. Not to
wallow in self indulgence as you put new programmers to the sword for
making the same mistakes you and every other beginner made when you
didnt know what a word or byte or pointer was properly.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

c prog -plz explain SAHIL MAHLA <sahilmehla@gmail.com> - 2014-03-10 14:50 -0700
  Re: c prog -plz explain Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-03-10 15:41 -0700
    Re: c prog -plz explain Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-03-10 23:21 +0000
      Re: c prog -plz explain Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-03-10 23:24 +0000
      Re: c prog -plz explain SAHIL MAHLA <sahilmehla@gmail.com> - 2014-03-10 20:28 -0700
        Re: c prog -plz explain James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-11 00:15 -0400
        Re: c prog -plz explain Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-11 07:12 +0000
          Re: c prog -plz explain Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2014-03-12 10:43 +0100
            Re: c prog -plz explain Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-12 14:38 +0000
              Re: c prog -plz explain Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2014-03-12 15:56 +0100
                Re: c prog -plz explain Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-03-12 11:16 -0400
                Re: c prog -plz explain James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-12 11:36 -0400
                Re: c prog -plz explain Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-12 15:38 +0000
              Re: c prog -plz explain glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-12 19:13 +0000
                Re: c prog -plz explain Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-03-12 16:05 -0400
                Re: c prog -plz explain James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-12 16:32 -0400
                Re: c prog -plz explain Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-13 09:38 +1300
                Re: c prog -plz explain Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-29 08:32 -0700
            Re: c prog -plz explain glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-12 19:03 +0000
              Re: c prog -plz explain James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-12 15:33 -0400
                Re: c prog -plz explain Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-12 20:56 +0000
                Re: c prog -plz explain Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-13 10:07 +1300
        Re: c prog -plz explain "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-03-11 10:33 +0000
  Re: c prog -plz explain Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2014-03-10 18:48 -0400
    Re: c prog -plz explain SAHIL MAHLA <sahilmehla@gmail.com> - 2014-03-10 20:26 -0700
      Re: c prog -plz explain Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-03-11 16:34 +1300
        typecasting (was Re: c prog -plz explain) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2014-03-12 07:03 +0000
          Re: typecasting (was Re: c prog -plz explain) Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-12 07:40 +0000
            Re: typecasting (was Re: c prog -plz explain) Lowell Gilbert <lgusenet@be-well.ilk.org> - 2014-03-12 10:47 -0400
            Re: typecasting (was Re: c prog -plz explain) Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2014-03-12 13:01 -0400
          Re: typecasting (was Re: c prog -plz explain) Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> - 2014-03-12 12:47 +0100
            Re: typecasting (was Re: c prog -plz explain) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2014-03-12 12:39 +0000
              Re: typecasting (was Re: c prog -plz explain) Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-12 15:06 +0000
      Re: c prog -plz explain Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-11 07:26 +0000
        Re: c prog -plz explain Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> - 2014-03-11 08:39 +0100
          Re: c prog -plz explain Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-11 08:08 +0000
      Re: c prog -plz explain Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2014-03-11 09:14 -0400
      Re: c prog -plz explain Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-03-11 15:38 +0000
  Re: c prog -plz explain Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2014-03-11 12:53 -0400
    Re: c prog -plz explain Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-03-11 11:47 -0700
      Re: c prog -plz explain glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-11 21:41 +0000
        Re: c prog -plz explain Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-11 22:01 +0000

csiph-web