Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #43822

Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem

Show all headers | View raw

Matthias Koch <matthias.koch@hot.uni-hannover.de> writes:
> Fine :-) If you wish, the current experimental RA has the same look
> and feel, just with more compiler performance under the hood.

Yes, I do want to try that, but don't have an easy way to run benchmarks
at the moment, so have stayed with the normal version.

> so I am puzzled why redirection, which should be transparent, breaks it.

Yes, I'm puzzled by this too.

> The talk at 32C3 will be translated by the Congress language team,

This sounds good, I can read German with some difficulty but I don't
have much hope understanding a spoken presentation.

> IT... deprecated messages, right ? Anything else ?

Output is here, pardon the long lines:

    $ ./assemble
    ../common/comparisions.s: Assembler messages:
    ../common/comparisions.s:86: Warning: IT blocks containing more than one conditional instruction are deprecated in ARMv8
    ../common/comparisions.s:133: Warning: IT blocks containing more than one conditional instruction are deprecated in ARMv8
    ../common/deepinsight.s:67: Warning: IT blocks containing more than one conditional instruction are deprecated in ARMv8
    ../common/compiler-flash.s:162: Warning: IT blocks containing more than one conditional instruction are deprecated in ARMv8
    ../common/numberstrings.s:304: Warning: IT blocks containing 16-bit Thumb instructions of the following class are deprecated in ARMv8: Short branches, Undefined, SVC, LDM/STM

> The terminal.s file would be the most interesting part for you, I think.

I'll take a look at it but don't expect too much :).

>> If you want to play with a Scaleway server 
> Thank you ! I would love to have a small account on yours in January.

I just put one on for you and emailed you the login details.  I don't
know if I'll still have it in January but they are easy to spin up and
down.  The only problem is there is currently a shortage of them and of
IP addresses in their data center, so getting one can take a few tries.
They say they are in the process of getting and deploying more of them.

> As Debian and Cyanogenmod have the same basic Kernel syscall interface,
> I can do development on my tablet computer, but a cross check with
> another machine can be helpful from time to time.

The experience on it should be similar to a Raspberry Pi 2 or so.  It's
a 4-core ARM7, 1.3 ghz if I remember right, roughly 1/8th the speed of a
fast x86 on most stuff I've tested.

Paul

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-25 23:40 -0800
  Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Matthias Koch <matthias.koch@hot.uni-hannover.de> - 2015-11-26 09:54 +0100
    Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-26 01:08 -0800
      Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Matthias Koch <matthias.koch@hot.uni-hannover.de> - 2015-11-26 10:37 +0100
        Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-26 01:52 -0800
          Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Matthias Koch <matthias.koch@hot.uni-hannover.de> - 2015-11-26 11:22 +0100
            Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-27 12:20 -0800
              Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Matthias Koch <matthias.koch@hot.uni-hannover.de> - 2015-12-09 15:04 +0100
                Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-12-09 23:50 -0800
                Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Matthias Koch <matthias.koch@hot.uni-hannover.de> - 2015-12-10 12:00 +0100
  Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-11-26 09:27 +0000
    Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-11-27 01:06 +0100
      Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-11-27 18:35 +0100
        Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-27 10:24 -0800
          Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-11-27 23:27 +0100
        Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-11-28 11:19 +0000
          Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-11-28 17:44 +0100
      Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-28 22:19 -0800
        Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-11-29 20:47 +0100
          Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-29 12:13 -0800
            Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-11-30 01:37 +0100
              Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-29 19:20 -0800
                Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-11-30 23:29 +0100
                Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-30 18:06 -0800
                Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-12-01 23:14 +0100
                Re: Mecrisp 2.1.6 ARM Linux problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-12-01 20:19 -0800

csiph-web