Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports |
| Date | 2014-12-23 09:57 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <873886lmcf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <87zjakwve1.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <m79gl4$4p3$1@dont-email.me> <m7a12i$pgd$1@dont-email.me> <m7ak9u$1tf$1@speranza.aioe.org> <68th9a5ioh6labt2587otipthfgtuavumc@4ax.com> |
Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> writes:
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 02:33:35 -0000, "James Harris"
> <james.harris.1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>"Ben Bacarisse" <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> wrote in message
>>news:m7a12i$pgd$1@dont-email.me...
<snip>
>>> But you can check. Does bcc support struct passing etc?
<snip>
>>In a couple of simple tests I found that structs were copied and returned
>>successfully but not passed. For example:
<snip>
>>struct pair printer(struct pair x) {
>>
>> printf("pair = %i,%i\n", x.a, x.b);
>> return x;
>>}
<snip>
> It has been *sooo* long since I've done a K&R prototype...
>
> But doesn't the second routine have to be:
>
>
> struct pair printer(x)
> struct pair x;
> {
> printf("pair = %i,%i\n", x.a, x.b);
> return x;
> }
I was going to suggest just this. bcc handles ANSI function prototype
with a pre-processing pass, so I'd certainly want to eliminate an error
in that part of the compilation by reverting to K&R C. Mind you, that
won't help James if he needs the -ansi flag for other reasons.
--
Ben.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-12-17 10:04 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-18 02:48 -0600
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-12-18 14:30 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports bert <bert.hutchings@btinternet.com> - 2014-12-18 11:49 -0800
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-18 14:27 -0600
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 16:30 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2015-01-29 15:53 +0100
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-29 17:33 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-29 17:52 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-29 18:24 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-29 18:42 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-01-30 09:56 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-30 10:13 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-01-30 13:21 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-01-30 14:16 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2015-02-01 08:54 +0100
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2015-01-30 10:17 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-12-18 10:13 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-12-18 12:34 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-12-18 15:06 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Nobody <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2014-12-18 10:27 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-18 04:44 -0600
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-12-18 15:21 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-12-18 20:33 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-12-22 16:25 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-22 14:38 -0600
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-12-22 21:14 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-12-23 02:42 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-22 22:52 -0600
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-12-23 11:00 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2014-12-23 14:46 -0600
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-24 05:21 -0600
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-12-23 08:13 +0100
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-12-22 20:02 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-12-23 02:33 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-22 23:05 -0600
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-12-23 09:57 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-12-23 10:49 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-12-22 21:18 +0000
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-12-18 10:12 -0800
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports Vincenzo Mercuri <nomail@yahoo.it> - 2014-12-18 18:52 +0100
Re: A data type for a wider integer than the compiler supports "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-12-18 18:17 +0000
csiph-web