Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #47611
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes |
| Date | 2016-05-29 11:27 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <871t4kg1o4.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> (permalink) |
| References | <496341e2-6ac8-4bcc-903e-c9e39e3495ae@googlegroups.com> <2016May28.120710@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <87d1o5fwdw.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <slrnnkmeaq.8vc.albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl> |
Albert van der Horst <albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl> writes: > On 64 bits that program can use a couple of Gbytes. The larger the > prime table to start with the faster it goes. Ok, fair enough. > It is probably worth dusting off, make it parallel. I'd be more interested in seeing better algorithms.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
32 bit VS 64 bit modes Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-27 11:21 -0700
Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-27 13:06 -0700
Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-27 13:22 -0700
Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-05-27 13:59 -0700
Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-05-28 10:07 +0000
Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-28 19:09 -0700
Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-28 20:00 -0700
Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes Albert van der Horst <albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-05-29 17:46 +0000
Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-29 11:27 -0700
Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-28 23:42 -0400
csiph-web