Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #574
| From | Ivan Shmakov <ivan@gray.siamics.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC? |
| Date | 2011-09-12 15:51 +0700 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <86k49eywgp.fsf@gray.siamics.net> (permalink) |
| References | <86hb4l3r1t.fsf@gray.siamics.net> <slrnj6otln.gtj.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <8639g330fb.fsf@gray.siamics.net> <1by5xv3syz.fsf@snowball.wb.pfeifferfamily.net> |
>>>>> Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> writes:
>>>>> Ivan Shmakov <ivan@gray.siamics.net> writes:
>>>>> Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> writes:
>>>>> On Sat, 2011-09-10, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
[…]
>>>> Or is BIND 9.7 really the best possible solution for this task?
>>> Is there any specific reason why you think bind won't do? Or do you
>>> simply think it's overkill because it has lots of features which you
>>> don't need?
>> Mostly the latter. However, I'm also somewhat constrained in
>> resources (virtual memory, for instance), since this NS is going
>> to be run on a so-called "virtual server", and it's a really
>> cheap one. (Not that I had any issues in a similar case, but
>> nevertheless.)
> dnsmasq is a good, lightweight, easy to configure, caching DNS (and
> DHCP) server.
Its Debian package's Description: states:
--cut: http://packages.debian.org/sid/dnsmasq --
Dnsmasq is a lightweight, easy to configure, DNS forwarder and DHCP
server. It is designed to provide DNS and optionally, DHCP, to a
small network.
--cut: http://packages.debian.org/sid/dnsmasq --
As it's only a forwarder, and thus doesn't store the zone
locally (beyond its cache), I see it inapplicable to the task of
serving a DNS zone (say, the aforementioned .siamics.net.) as a
«slave» server.
> I don't know whether it supports DNSSEC.
--
FSF associate member #7257 Coming soon: Software Freedom Day
http://mail.sf-day.org/lists/listinfo/ planning-ru (ru), sfd-discuss (en)
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC? Ivan Shmakov <ivan@gray.siamics.net> - 2011-09-10 12:27 +0700
Re: lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-09-11 08:52 +0000
Re: lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC? Ivan Shmakov <ivan@gray.siamics.net> - 2011-09-11 16:15 +0700
Re: lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC? Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2011-09-11 11:10 -0600
Re: lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC? David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-09-12 09:11 +0200
Re: lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC? Ivan Shmakov <ivan@gray.siamics.net> - 2011-09-12 15:51 +0700
Re: lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC? David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2011-09-12 11:12 +0200
Re: lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC? Ivan Shmakov <ivan@gray.siamics.net> - 2011-09-13 01:18 +0700
Re: lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC? David Brown <david.brown@removethis.hesbynett.no> - 2011-09-12 21:09 +0200
Re: lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC? Hauke Lampe <packbart@blagga.openchaos.org> - 2011-09-11 13:29 +0000
Re: lightweight "slave" DNS server, +DNSSEC? Ivan Shmakov <ivan@gray.siamics.net> - 2011-09-11 22:29 +0700
csiph-web