Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #121350
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: We have a new standard! |
| Date | 2024-12-30 18:06 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <86jzbgbo70.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <vkrk4l$10d4e$1@dont-email.me> <vkshgh$1799g$1@dont-email.me> <20241230004450.0000202d@yahoo.com> <86seq5bete.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vku21r$1kbjn$1@dont-email.me> |
boltar@caprica.org writes: > On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 03:17:17 -0800 > Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wibbled: > >> Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes: >> >>> On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 00:12:31 +0200 >>> Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> wrote: >>> >>>> On 29.12.2024 15:51, David Brown wrote: >>>> >>>>> You can have an informed opinion about C++, and agree or disagree >>>>> with the opinions of the committee members. >>>>> >>>>> But what you don't get to do - or at least, don't get to do if you >>>>> want to be viewed seriously - is spout an /uninformed/ opinion. >>>>> That's no more than mindless prejudice, and of no interest to >>>>> anyone. >>>> >>>> Thanks David, for standing against the trolls. It's a pity that >>>> personal freedoms are often interpreted as "my ignorant opinion has >>>> exactly the same worth as your expert knowledge". >>>> >>>> I'm all for personal freedoms, but my freedoms end where they might >>>> hurt other people, or the nature for that matter. Boasting ignorant >>>> jumble can easily do that. >>> >>> It seems that Muttley@dastardlyhq.com still didn't figure out why >>> stating strong opinion about something that you not just didn't learn >>> in depth, but didn't even look at casually is less than optimal. >> >> For some time now I have simply stopped reading his comments. >> I don't know why anyone bothers with him for more than a handful >> of interactions. > > The same could be said about you. I assume you mean that someone might have the same reaction to me as you imagine I have to Muttley. Note that I didn't say anything about Muttley; my comments were statements only about myself, not about anyone else.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: We have a new standard! Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-12-27 21:51 -0500
Re: We have a new standard! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 20:11 -0800
Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-28 10:19 +0000
Re: We have a new standard! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-12-28 16:20 +0100
Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-29 09:32 +0000
Re: We have a new standard! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-12-29 14:51 +0100
Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-29 16:16 +0000
Re: We have a new standard! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-12-30 08:34 +0100
Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-30 09:34 +0000
Re: We have a new standard! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-12-30 15:37 +0100
Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-30 15:08 +0000
Re: We have a new standard! James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-12-30 18:06 -0500
Re: We have a new standard! Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-01 17:55 +0200
Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-01-01 16:05 +0000
Re: We have a new standard! Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2024-12-30 00:12 +0200
Re: We have a new standard! Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-30 00:44 +0200
Re: We have a new standard! Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-12-30 03:17 -0800
Re: We have a new standard! boltar@caprica.org - 2024-12-30 12:00 +0000
Re: We have a new standard! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-12-30 15:52 +0100
Re: We have a new standard! Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-12-30 18:06 -0800
Re: We have a new standard! Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2024-12-30 22:26 -0500
Re: We have a new standard! Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-12-30 03:14 -0800
Re: We have a new standard! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-12-30 16:05 +0100
Re: We have a new standard! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 16:02 -0800
Re: We have a new standard! Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-12-30 17:58 -0800
Re: We have a new standard! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-12-31 10:54 +0100
Re: We have a new standard! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 13:40 -0800
Re: We have a new standard! Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-30 13:25 +0200
Re: We have a new standard! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-12-30 17:15 +0100
Re: We have a new standard! Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-04 21:40 +0200
Re: We have a new standard! Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2024-12-28 13:05 -0500
Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-29 09:43 +0000
Re: We have a new standard! Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-12-29 08:50 -0500
Re: We have a new standard! wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 22:33 +0800
Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-29 16:17 +0000
Re: We have a new standard! wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 01:08 +0800
Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-29 17:11 +0000
Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-29 16:15 +0000
Re: We have a new standard! Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-12-29 11:57 -0500
Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-29 17:08 +0000
Re: We have a new standard! Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-29 19:50 +0200
csiph-web