Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #150953
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Unicode in C Sources |
| Date | 2020-04-02 07:50 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <865zei6ix3.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <r19neh$2lc$1@dont-email.me> <r1a347$em1$1@dont-email.me> <341090e3-1f1b-47bf-aded-7337c29f3692@googlegroups.com> <86d0aae2wm.fsf@linuxsc.com> <c5a91caa-2567-4776-82e0-3b2674be7d7f@googlegroups.com> |
James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > In C90, the set of extended characters was implementation-defined, both > in the source and execution character sets. They therefore could not be > used by code that needs to be maximally portable, but not all code > needs to be that portable. > However, the only places where the syntax allowed for extended > characters was character constants, string literals, and header names. > > C99 changed that, by also allowing an implementation-defined set of > extended characters to appear in identifiers. Of course, maximally > portable code cannot take advantage of that fact, but as I said above, > not all code needs to be that portable. > > It seems quite reasonable to me to, in a short summary of the changes > from C90, refer to that change using the phrase "extended > identifiers". It also seems reasonable to me to assume that that phrase > refers to that change. It might also refer to the change you refer to, > though that seems unlikely to me. I consider it even less likely that > it refers only to the change that you mentioned. The term "extended" > plays a key role in the text that's relevant to the change I was > talking about, it plays no such role in the text describing the change > that you're talking about. Is there some reason you didn't quote the remark you're responding to?
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Unicode in C Sources Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2020-02-19 12:30 -0800
Re: Unicode in C Sources James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-02-19 14:19 -0800
Re: Unicode in C Sources Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2020-04-02 07:50 -0700
Re: Unicode in C Sources James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-04-02 08:16 -0700
csiph-web