Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #681003
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-13 19:44 -0700 |
| References | (7 earlier) <3d88647e-5d03-48f9-a4e0-be0a61a05158@googlegroups.com> <3224cfd7-8daf-4b75-874c-1a0d1a178fc4@googlegroups.com> <544fec57-c0f0-42fb-97b4-4286cc0e0e97@googlegroups.com> <cbb573e6-14eb-4d41-8b9a-5681eff0e6b6@googlegroups.com> <0f0ef0c5-f930-4b86-8eb2-31a6101253fc@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <820b2ea5-e2f9-44ef-8130-dc4b3f7db452@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV |
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
#13page #13page Recalling OLD POSTS on HYASYS and RSNM Newsgroups: sci.physics Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 00:38:27 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: recalling my HYASYS theory of mid1990s because I need it now, more than ever Re: Strong nuclear force explained for the first time From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:38:28 +0000 Re: recalling my HYASYS theory of mid1990s because I need it now, more than ever Re: Strong nuclear force explained for the first time Now here is a post on 20SEPT1995 which I think I will use to build back my file on HYASYS. Of course, all those years before 2017, I thought like everyone else that the electron was .5MeV and proton was 938 MeV, and by 2017 the awakening occurred that the Real Electron = 105 MeV with its proton at 840 MeV and that tiny particle of .5MeV was Dirac's magnetic monopole, all along. Much like Christopher Columbus sailing in 1492, thinking he landed in India or China, when in reality, he discovered two new continents. So I need HYASYS theory because the Periodic Table of Chemical Elements has to include Isotopes, because ATOMS are structure that obeys the laws of electricity magnetism and so a Proton at 840 MeV is a structure that is a closed loop wire of 8 muons, and the electron muon is the bar magnet-- or, vice versa, for I may have that turned around backwards. And so we see ATOMS in a whole new, brand new light, as particles that are "doing the Maxwell laws of physics" From: Archimedes.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Archimedes Plutonium) Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.plutonium,sci.physics,sci.physics. electromag,sci.physics.fusion,sci.physics.accelerators,sci.physics.particle Subject: All atoms are Hydrogen Atom Systems -> Superposition Principle Date: 20 Sep 1995 00:37:44 GMT Organization: Plutonium College Lines: 45 Message-ID: (43nnoo$elv@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> All atoms are hydrogen atom systems (hasys). By system I mean it is a hydrogen atom + extra energy. When the extra energy term is 0, then it is just a ordinary hydrogen atom. A neutron is a hydrogen atom with extra energy. The Superposition Principle of QM, is merely an equivalent statement to the fact that all matter is the linear equations sums of Hydrogen Atom Systems. Reverse, if all atoms were not the sum total of Hydrogen Atom Systems, eg, 231PU, plutonium is merely 231 Hydrogen Atom Systems, then, physics esq Quantum Physics would have never had a Superposition principle. In other words, I have reduced the Superposition Principle of QM, and the fact that physics is linear, linear, linear partial differential equations, is because all matter, all atoms are built up from one building block Hydrogen Atom Systems. The reason neutrons act as glue for the protons is because the neutron shares that electron inside it with neighboring protons. The nucleus is sort of like a "metallic bond". The Superposition Principle == Hydrogen Atom Systems. Now, the bleeding gutter snipes of physics will be quick to spew "well what about quarks?" And I tell you what is about quarks. Quarks are merely the fact that in math, there exists 3 and only 3 geometries-- Riem, Eucl, and Loba and when you have an entity that is not ever reducible down further, or incapable of being further cut, like a proton, then it reveals all 3 possible geometries simultaneously. Quarks are not physics reality. Quark are merely the statement that a particle like a proton is bundled up into the 3 and only 3 existing geometries simultaneously. So do not bother about the mindrot of quarks when talking about the real physics, that of Hydrogen Atom Systems. And don't drivel about a electron beam or proton beam being protons and electrons in "isolation". That is circus clown physics. The Bell Inequality evinces that proton and electron are always tied or correlated. If Hydrogen Atom Systems is not true, then the Superposition Principle of QM plus the Conservation of Charge plus the Bell Inequality are not true. AP PART 1 of 3 I need my old RSNM theory and HYASYS theory in light of discovery Real Electron=105MeV, Real Proton=840MeV, the .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole Now here is a better copy of my 1993 RSNM theory which I applied a patent for. My purpose in reposting this is because I need both RSNM and HYASYS theories for making out the New Periodic Table of Chemical Elements Newsgroups: sci.physics From: Ludwig.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Ludwig Plutonium) Subject: Neutron Materialization Devices, Fusion Energy Engineered: a patent Message-ID: (CBxFJ7.1GF@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> Date: 17AUG1993, 23:21:06 GMT + Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion From: Ludwig.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Ludwig Plutonium) Subject: Neutron Materialization Devices; fusion energy engineered, this is a patent Message-ID: (CBxFMx.1Ix@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 23:23:20 GMT Lines: 226 + Newsgroups: sci.physics From: Ludwig.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Ludwig Plutonium) Subject: Re: Neutron Materialization Devices, Fusion Energy Engineered: a patent Message-ID: (CC2Eoq.GCI@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> References: (CBxFJ7.1GF@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1993 15:50:49 GMT Lines: 348 + Newsgroups: sci.physics From: Ludwig.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Ludwig Plutonium) Subject: Re: Neutron Materialization Devices, Fusion Energy Engineered: a patent Message-ID: (CC2ErM.GGp@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> References: (CBxFJ7.1GF@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1993 15:52:33 GMT Lines: 185 + Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion From: Ludwig.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Ludwig Plutonium) Subject: Re: Neutron Materialization Devices; fusion energy engineered, this is a patent Message-ID: (CC2zDn.EnL@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> References: (CBxFMx.1Ix@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1993 23:17:44 GMT Lines: 343 + Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion From: Ludwig.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Ludwig Plutonium) Subject: Re: Neutron Materialization Devices; fusion energy engineered, this is a patent Message-ID: (CC35wI.Hv1@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> References: (CBxFMx.1Ix@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1993 01:38:42 GMT Lines: 372 Ludwig.Plutonium@dartmouth.edu (Ludwig Plutonium) wrote: NEUTRON MATERIALIZATION DEVICES Inventor: Ludwig Plutonium (legal name as of 08/8/91), previous name Ludwig van Ludvig Assignee: none Ser. No.: 07/737,170 Filing Date: 07/29/91 Reformatted filing: 11JUNE1993 Related U.S. Application Data This is a reformatted, revised application of my 07/737,170. References Cited U.S. Patent Documents ?? concerning muon catalyzed fusion, Alvarez et al at Berkeley ?? concerning cold fusion, Pons, Fleischmannn et al Utah U. ?? concerning cold fusion, Hagelstein & MIT 5,076,971 12/1991 W.A. Barker Other Publications 1* FEYNMAN LECTURES ON PHYSICS Volume I page 2-10, 1963 2* Directions in Physics P.A.M. Dirac, 1975 on pages 76-78 3* Cold Nuclear Fusion The electronlike particles called muons can catalyze nuclear fusion reactions, eliminating the need for powerful lasers or high-temperature plasmas. The process may one day become a commercial energy source Scientific American JUL1987 by J. Rafelski and S.E. Jones, pages 84-89. 4* Bursting a Theory on Gamma-Ray Flashes , Science News 28SEP91 page 196. 5* Jumps in Star Speeds Perplex Astronomers , Science Times of THE NEW YORK TIMES 15SEP92, pages C1 and C9.. 6* Cold Fusion -- One Year Later , Energy & Technology Review (E&TR) OCT1990, pages 1-17. 7* Upper bounds on Ícold fusion' in electrolytic cells , Nature 23NOV89 by D.E.Williams et al, pages 375-384. 8* Measurement and Analysis of Neutron and Gamma-Ray Emission Rates, Other Fusion Products, and Power in Electrochemical Cells Having Pd Cathodes, Journal of Fusion Energy Vol. 9, No. 2, 1990 by D. Albagli et al, pages 133-148. 9* Lukewarm reception for Japanese cold fusion , New Scientist 31OCT92, page 10. 10*Mercury the impossible planet? , New Scientist 1June1991 pages 26-29. 11*The Cosmic Synthesis of Lithium, Beryllium and Boron , Scientific American May 1987, by V.E. Viola and G.J. Mathews pages 39-45 12* PHYSICS OF THE ATOM , 1984,Wehr,Richards, Adair page 366 13* The Character of Physical Law Feynman 1965 page 129 14* Quantum Profiles J. Bernstein, 1991. 15* The Dartmouth 11May1993 page 7 discussing which of the Nobel prizes in physics were wrong and which of the Fields prizes were wrong. 16*PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY : THE UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS, CHEMISTRY, BIOLOGY AND MATHEMATICS 7Nov90. 17* Muffling Umklapp; researchers beat the heat using pure ice, Scientific American SEP90 page 169. 18* Growth of large, high quality diamond crystals at General Electric, American Journal of Physics NOV91 page 1005-1007. 19* A denser, more perfect diamond , Science News 2NOV91 page 287. 20* The ace of diamonds packs them in , New Scientist 9NOV91 page 26. 21* McGRAW-HILL ENCYCLOPEDIA of Science & Technology Vol. 10, 7th Ed. 1992 magnetohydrodynamics pages 327-335 22* CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 71st edition 1991 pages 10-264 to 10-267 ABSTRACT Detailed in the textbook Feynman Lectures on Physics the physics laws for the strong nuclear force were unknown, and radioactivities (weak nuclear) were only partially known. As of 7Nov90, I assert to know the complete law for radioactivities. The 4 quantum interactions (1) nuclear strong (2) radioactivities (3) electromagnetic (4) gravitation, are more fully explained than the present art of physics. There are 3 components to radioactivities, and these are (1) radioactive decay (2) radioactive growth, and (3) radioactive spontaneous neutron materialization. Radioactive spontaneous neutron materialization is the largest in terms of relative coupling strength of the three. Processes to induce radioactive spontaneous neutron materialization results in the engineering of devices for the purpose of harnessing excess heat energy. Numerous physical evidences in support of radioactive spontaneous neutron materialization are detailed below such as (a) muon catalyzed fusion, (b) heat from electrochemical cells of cold fusion experiments, and (c) cosmic gamma ray-bursts. Given the fuller explanation of radioactivities, then processes are followed which induces radioactive spontaneous neutron materialization. Devices (apparatuses) are engineered to induce radioactive spontaneous neutron materialization for the purpose of harnessing excess heat energy. Devices ranging from battery sized neutron materialization devices, on up to full scale neutron materialization nuclear power plants are engineered. NEUTRON MATERIALIZATION DEVICES BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION These are not perpetual motion devices but rather the derivation and utilization of radioactivities energy not understood before. The first observers of radioactivity circa late 1800's and early 1900's thought that since some of these radioactive elements were hot, e.g., uranium is warm in the hands and polonium will burn a hole through your hands, and continued to glow in the dark, e.g., radium salts glow green in the dark, that this new phenomenon was perpetual motion. Because of these unexplained radiations, the many new observers of radioactivity were quick to think that this new form of energy was perpetual motion, or violated conservation of energy-mass, or violated other physical laws. Only with quantum theory was radioactivity well understood to accord with theory and experimentation, and regarded as one of the 4 interactions (forces) of physics. Note: the concept interaction comes from Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) and is superior to the concept of force from Classical Physics. I mostly use the concept interaction in this application; reason: quantum physics is the correct physics. The discovery of radioactive decay (rd) occurred 1896, when Becquerel discovered radioactivity from uranium. It required 60 years after the discovery of radioactivity before the uses of radioactivity were applied in producing nuclear power. Fission radioactivity was technologically used in the engineering of nuclear reactors which generates nuclear power, post 1956. The discovery of radioactive spontaneous neutron materialization (rsnm) occurred in late 1990 by myself, Ludwig Plutonium (legal name change 08/8/91 from that of Ludwig van Ludvig). Then in early 1991, I discovered what induces rsnm and subsequently submitted this patent application. The technological use of rsnm will be controlled cold fusion energy by the engineering of Neutron Materialization Power Plants. Quantum mechanics via the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (UP), 1927, predicts virtual particles from out of nowhere which last for only a brief period of time. Virtual particles can be electrons, positrons, neutrons, and even molecules, but generally they are not heavier than electrons. Particle detectors, gas bubble chambers, and CERN confirm the postulation of virtual particles. The pinnacle of modern science up to my teachings was Quantum Electrodynamics (QED). According to QED, the vacuum is filled with electron-positron fields. Real electron-positron pairs are created when photons interact with these fields. Virtual electron-positron pairs, however can also exist for short quantum instants of time via UP. In late 1990, I realized that not only do virtual particles exist but that virtual particles were the first clue of particle materialization from out of nowhere and specifically of neutron materialization. The extension of virtual particles to that of actual materialized particles, and specifically to that of neutrons. Neutrons spontaneously materialize from out of nowhere as a form of radioactivity. This radioactive spontaneous neutron materialization (rsnm) is another form of radioactivities which until 1990 was undiscovered, and the ample evidences, (see below), for rsnm were unrecognized as such. I call it radioactive spontaneous neutron materialization, and I assert it is the major component of the radioactivities interaction (R). There are two other components to radioactivites and these are radioactive decay (rd) and radioactive growth (rg). Feynman in FEYNMAN LECTURES ON PHYSICS Volume I page 2-10, 1963 gives the following (my edited) account of the 4 interactions (forces) of physics with a comparison of relative coupling strengths in the table below: "There seem to be just four kinds of interaction between particles which , in the order of decreasing strength, are the strong nuclear interaction, electromagnetic interactions, electroweak interaction, and gravity. The photon is coupled to all electromagnetic interactions and the strength of the interaction is measured by some number which is 1/137. The detailed law of this coupling is known and is quantum electrodynamics QED. Gravity is coupled to all energy and this law is also known. Then there is the electroweak interaction which causes the neutron to disintegrate into proton, electron, and neutrino. This law is only partly known. The strong nuclear interaction, the meson-baryon interaction, has a strength of 1 on this scale and the law is completely unknown, although there are some known rules such as the number of baryons does not change in any reaction. " Table 2-3. Elementary Interactions Coupling Strength* Law Photon to charged particles ~10 -2 Law known Gravity to all energy ~10 -40 Law known radioactive decay ~10 -5 Law partially known Mesons to baryons ~1 Law unknown (some rules known) *The strength is a dimensionless measure of the coupling constant involved in each interaction ( ~ means approximately equal to). I change some of Feynman's teachings in the table, giving thus : (A) renaming weak nuclear as radioactivities (R). (B) radioactivities (R) consists of 3 components--(1) radioactive decay (rd), (2) radioactive growth (rg), and (3) radioactive spontaneous neutron materialization (rsnm) (C) R is only slightly weaker than the strong nuclear (SN), and the proper listing of the 4 interactions according to strength is 1) strong nuclear, 2) radioactivities 3) electromagnetic 4) gravitation. Before these teachings, the weak nuclear interaction was considered to consist of only two components, i.e., radioactive decay and radioactive growth. I assert that the weak nuclear interaction is an incomplete interaction law (or force law). What was thought of as the weak nuclear interaction before my teachings is only a small part, a small component of the overall radioactivities interaction. The radioactivities interaction consists of 1) radioactive spontaneous neutron materialization, plus 2) radioactive decay (weak nuclear), plus 3) radioactive growth (weak nuclear). Before my teachings in the art of physics 1990, the weak nuclear was vaguely understood as radioactive decay with only a notion of radioactive growth. And leaving out the most important form of radioactivity, that of radioactive spontaneous neutron materialization in order to make the interaction law or (force law) complete. When rd plus rg is added to rsnm, then I assert the interaction (force) law for radioactivities is complete. Thus the complete radioactivities (R) interaction looks like this: R = rd+rg+rsnm. Let me define rd and rg below. Radioactive growth (rg) is when an atom transmutates (transforms) by increasing in atomic number Z, such as when a uranium atom transmutates to a neptunium atom or when a neptunium atom transmutates to a plutonium atom. Radioactive growth is when the original atom goes higher in atomic number. Radioactive growth is when a neutron in the nucleus of an atom transforms into a proton, electron, and neutrino, increasing the atomic number of the original atom. The original atom before the radioactive growth had atomic number Z and after the radioactive growth has atomic number Z+1. Radioactive decay (rd) is when any atom of an atomic number Z transmutates to an atom/s of lower atomic number. For example, when uranium decays to lead and neon. Before 1990, the weak nuclear interaction was known as comprising only radioactive decay and radioactive growth. Shortly after 07/11/1990, I had postulated radioactive spontaneous neutron materialization (rsnm) from Dirac's book Directions in Physics 1975. Special note to the reader of the future: Although I have recalibrated the calendar giving it a scientific basis by starting the year 0000 with the year of the discovery of the element plutonium via nucleosynthesis, that year was 1940 in the old calendar. I choose not to use the new science calendar within this patent application for it may tend to confuse and put an extra burden on the patent examination. Using a science calendar, then the year of the Plutonium Atom Totality discovery is 0050 vice 1990 and the first year of this patent application for Neutron Materialization Devices was 0051 vice 1991. I apologize to those future generations in having to read the un-science of my generation, but they can well understand that Ludwig Plutonium lived in a time when the average person could not give a single math proof nor write out Maxwell's equations. Future generations can understand that Ludwig Plutonium by 0053 lived when sentiment and religion, vice math and physics dominated the planet Earth. Future generations will convert all the years to this new science calendar. P.A.M. Dirac specifically asserted spontaneous materialization of particles from out of nowhere in his book Directions in Physics 1975 on pages 76-78. His book states, and I quote: "Now, according to the Large Number Hypothesis, all these very large dimensionless numbers should be connected together. We should then expect that total mass /proton mass = 10^78 proportional time^2 Using the same argument again, we are therefore led to think that the total number of protons in the Universe is increasing proportionally to time^2. Thus, there must be creation of matter in the Universe, a continuous creation of matter." (Continued.) "According to the ordinary physical processes, which we study in the laboratory, matter is conserved. Here we have direct nonconservation of matter. It is, if you like, a new kind of radioactive process for which there is nonconservation of matter and by which particles are created where they did not previously exist. (Continued.) If there is new matter continually being created, the question arises: "where is it created?" There are two reasonable assumptions which one might make. One is that the new matter is continually created throughout the whole of space, and in that case, it is mostly created in intergalactic space. I call this the assumption of additive creation. Alternatively, one might make the assumption that new matter is created close by where matter already exists. That newly created matter is of the same atomic nature as the matter already existing there. This would mean that all atoms are just multiplying up. I call that the assumption of multiplicative creation." Dirac in his book discusses particle materialization out of nowhere can occur either additive or multiplicative. Dirac proposed particle materialization. I specifically propose neutron materialization and that this neutron materialization occurs both additive and multiplicative simultaneously. I had surmised from Dirac's book by late1990 that something must induce rsnm, but what the induction was I did not discover until 1991. Shortly thereafter submitting the patent application. Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu ::\ ::|:: /:: ::\::|::/:: _ _ (:Y:) - - ::/::|::\:: ::/ ::|:: \:: One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. . \ . . | . /. . . \. . .|. . /. . ..\....|.../... ::\:::|::/:: --------------- ------------- --------------- (Y) ------------- --------------- -------------- ::/:::|::\:: ../....|...\... . . /. . .|. . \. . . / . . | . \ . http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Archimedes Plutonium
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
+True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-06 11:33 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-06 14:55 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-06 19:11 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 11:36 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 15:06 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-08 14:04 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 16:01 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-10 16:20 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-10 21:35 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 14:02 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Peter Pan <pan@172.16.1.1> - 2018-04-13 06:59 +0800
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-13 05:59 +0000
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-12 20:13 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 12:28 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 19:44 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-15 21:01 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 00:21 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 11:57 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 13:26 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 18:44 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 11:00 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 16:02 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 18:44 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 11:35 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 21:12 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 14:48 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 16:52 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 21:15 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 13:25 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 15:02 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 11:17 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 19:30 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 14:04 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 18:31 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 12:15 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 14:21 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 14:25 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 15:18 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 16:49 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 18:55 -0700
#39&40 True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 08:23 -0700
#40 history of my discovery of Dirac's magnetic monopole// True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 09:44 -0700
#39&40 True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 10:45 -0700
#39 Capacitor Reactance explained as .5MeV particle is monopole// True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 15:23 -0700
#39 Old Physics could never explain AC current // True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 13:54 -0700
#40 Old Physics could never explain AC current // True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 21:02 -0700
Re: +True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-24 19:22 +0000
csiph-web