Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > it.comp.hardware.storage > #24174
| From | Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | it.comp.hardware.storage |
| Subject | Re: Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 vs Western Digital WD10EZEX |
| Date | 2015-11-08 12:41 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <80p3hc-423.ln1@lazy.lzy> (permalink) |
| References | <n17gj0$2je$1@dont-email.me> |
On 2015-11-02 12:16, Max wrote:
> Prezzo praticamente identico...su quale mi butto?
Il Seagate e` parecchio piu` veloce.
Riguardo l'affidabilita`, un primo test, che non ha
nessuna rilevanza statistica (pochi dischi) mi dice
che il Seagate e` piu` affidabile.
Ho 3 Seagate DM003 che funzionano perfettamente, mentre
un (solo) WD10EZEX, che dopo poche ore (circa 2000~3000,
credo) ha iniziato a dare problemi di "pending sector" e
simili ("unreadable" forse).
Una riscrittura del disco ha forzato la "relocation".
Ovviamente, essendo un solo disco, non fa statistica.
Il secondo WD verra` usato tra poco, credo, vedremo
come andra`...
bye,
--
piergiorgio
Back to it.comp.hardware.storage | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 vs Western Digital WD10EZEX Max <maxfalsa@despammed.com> - 2015-11-02 12:16 +0100
Re: Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 vs Western Digital WD10EZEX "Freccia (VegetaSSj)" <NIENTESPAMfreccia_vegetassj@hotmail.invalid> - 2015-11-02 21:41 +0100
Re: Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 vs Western Digital WD10EZEX Max <maxfalsa@despammed.com> - 2015-11-03 13:31 +0100
Re: Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 vs Western Digital WD10EZEX Lorenz <lorpilon@libero.it> - 2015-11-03 16:55 +0100
Re: Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 vs Western Digital WD10EZEX "Freccia (VegetaSSj)" <NIENTESPAMfreccia_vegetassj@hotmail.invalid> - 2015-11-03 21:31 +0100
Re: Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 vs Western Digital WD10EZEX Lorenz <lorpilon@libero.it> - 2015-11-03 21:47 +0100
Re: Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 vs Western Digital WD10EZEX Max <maxfalsa@despammed.com> - 2015-11-04 10:35 +0100
Re: Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 vs Western Digital WD10EZEX Lorenz <lorpilon@libero.it> - 2015-11-04 11:04 +0100
Re: Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 vs Western Digital WD10EZEX Max <maxfalsa@despammed.com> - 2015-11-04 12:05 +0100
Re: Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 vs Western Digital WD10EZEX Max <maxfalsa@despammed.com> - 2015-11-04 12:36 +0100
Re: Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 vs Western Digital WD10EZEX Max <maxfalsa@despammed.com> - 2015-11-07 10:57 +0100
Re: Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 vs Western Digital WD10EZEX Lorenz <lorpilon@libero.it> - 2015-11-07 19:16 +0100
Re: Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 vs Western Digital WD10EZEX Max <maxfalsa@despammed.com> - 2015-11-08 11:59 +0100
Re: Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 vs Western Digital WD10EZEX Lorenz <lorpilon@libero.it> - 2015-11-08 22:32 +0100
Re: Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 vs Western Digital WD10EZEX Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> - 2015-11-08 12:41 +0100
Re: Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 vs Western Digital WD10EZEX Max <maxfalsa@despammed.com> - 2015-11-08 20:25 +0100
csiph-web