Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #30776

Re: Are Computer able to think?

From David Hume <David.Hume@example.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Are Computer able to think?
References (1 earlier) <7z4n0dzrld.fsf@example.com> <lltaap$fbo$1@news.albasani.net> <7zvbstyb50.fsf@example.com> <llte15$t2g$9@solani.org> <llvutr$ulk$1@dont-email.me>
Date 2014-05-26 20:42 +0100
Message-ID <7zvbssxr7b.fsf@example.com> (permalink)
Organization Haphazard

Show all headers | View raw


"Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> writes:

> Don't you find it odd that you are arguing with David Hume? He may be

David Hume is not my real name, I chose it in honour of our great
philosopher.

I wonder what programming language he would like if he were alive today?
I hope he would be a pragmatist like me and select the best one for the
job.

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Are Computer able to think? David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-25 18:38 +0100
  Re: Are Computer able to think? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-05-25 19:47 +0200
    Re: Are Computer able to think? David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-25 19:19 +0100
      Re: Are Computer able to think? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-05-25 20:50 +0200
        Re: Are Computer able to think? "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2014-05-26 18:50 +0100
          Re: Are Computer able to think? David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-05-26 20:42 +0100
    Re: Are Computer able to think? "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-25 16:31 -0400
      Re: Are Computer able to think? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-05-25 22:36 +0200
      Re: Are Computer able to think? HaveANiceDay <HaveANiceDay@NoSpam.invalid> - 2014-05-28 16:54 +0200
  Re: Are Computer able to think? "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-25 16:36 -0400

csiph-web