Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #21319

Re: loop through an arry

Message-ID <7605845.zP1Jr4sAA4@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Date 2013-09-13 05:23 +0200
Subject Re: loop through an arry
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
References <l0tb6o$8a5$1@dont-email.me> <b7567773-4470-4827-b2a2-3e1057c303fe@googlegroups.com> <2406331.xsRxLlKTau@PointedEars.de> <l0tt67$ge1$1@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw


Stefan Weiss wrote:

> On 2013-09-13 03:17, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> What matters is the unnecessary repeated property access when the
>> property value does not change.  As a result, the “book alternative”
>> (which IIRC were suggested here almost a decade ago, perhaps even by me)
>> is considerably faster.
> 
> Caveats about changing array lengths during the course of a loop aside,
> what matters most is the implementation. Practically all modern JS
> engines contain optimizations for the uncached alternative. In some rare
> cases, they even test faster when array.length is (supposedly) checked
> on each iteration. There are hundreds of tests about this on jsperf.com,
> if you're curious.

This nonsense has already been disproved.  You are not paying attention.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

loop through an arry "Tony Johansson" <johansson.andersson@telia.com> - 2013-09-12 23:19 +0200
  Re: loop through an arry Adrián Espinosa <mortuuslordofdeads@gmail.com> - 2013-09-12 14:30 -0700
    Re: loop through an arry Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-09-13 03:17 +0200
      Re: loop through an arry Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-09-13 04:27 +0200
        Re: loop through an arry Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-09-13 05:23 +0200
          Re: loop through an arry Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2013-09-13 05:36 +0200
      Re: loop through an arry "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2013-09-13 09:48 +0200
  Re: loop through an arry Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-09-12 16:35 -0500
    Re: loop through an arry Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-09-12 16:39 -0700
      Re: loop through an arry Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-09-12 19:45 -0500
        Re: loop through an arry Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-09-13 11:18 -0700
          Re: loop through an arry Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-09-14 01:49 +0200
            Re: loop through an arry Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-09-13 17:06 -0700

csiph-web