Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #272759
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| References | (1 earlier) <MpednVQcrcJDV1LInZ2dnUU7-TWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <6b45c726d40c2a4a4edb3b9954a737cf@dizum.com> <9e2dnSynY8CSZVLInZ2dnUU7-WednZ2d@giganews.com> <1087c0b89cb5fc3c07f44c1a14ed458c@dizum.com> <hpWdnbcGuolCB03InZ2dnUU7-eednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... (laughing at FNVWE) |
| Message-ID | <75e6402e6ff60efd5239a72965372c6d@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2015-08-16 21:17 +0200 |
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:hpWdnbcGuolCB03InZ2dnUU7-eednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:1087c0b89cb5fc3c07f44c1a14ed458c@dizum.com... >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Rocky, in <news:9e2dnSynY8CSZVLInZ2dnUU7-WednZ2d@giganews.com> >> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> >>> wrote in message news:6b45c726d40c2a4a4edb3b9954a737cf@dizum.com... >>>> The EMP took place, if you'll refer back to the link to the video >>>> *you* provided, when the planes hit the towers and exploded, >>>> *not* when the towers collapsed, you idiotic dipshit. LOL >>> Now wait a second. The link I use to support the fact EMPs were recorded >>> in Nuke York City is: >>> http://youtu.be/Jxpc6DBHeFA?t=3m30s >> Bwahahaha! That wasn't an EMP, you clueless goof. That was >> satellite uplink interference. Still snipping out all that data that proves your brain is badly malfunctioning? Fixored: >> Bwahahaha! That wasn't an EMP, you clueless goof. That was >> satellite uplink interference. It happens from time to time. It >> likely was caused by so many news teams trying to uplink at the >> same time. >> >> Educate yourself, you brainless moron: >> <http://www.unidir.ch/files/conferences/pdfs/harmful-interference-regional-security-consequences-en-1-933.pdf> >> >> Like it happened at 0:47 seconds, and at 0:55 seconds, and at >> 1:06, 1:08, 1:18, 1:35, 1:41, 1:47, 1:51, 2:00, 2:03, 2:39, 2:40, >> 2:58, 3:16, 3:30, 3:38, 3:48, and 3:50 in that very video. LOL >> >> That long interference lasting from 3:38 to 3:44 wasn't an EMP >> from a nuke. Nuclear EMPs last on the order of nanoseconds, and >> they blow out electronic equipment *because* of their short >> duration, high intensity EMP spike, you retard. >> >> If it'd been a nuclear EMP, the *last* thing you would have seen >> from that camera would have been the EMP. >> >> Kook. LOL >>> And the EMP recorded by WCBS is recorded at the exact same time the ground >>> shook as proven by a camera on the ground. And I can find that video too if >>> you want to see it. >> That would be because the building was buckling and starting to >> fall, the vibrations traveling down the central support column to >> the ground. It was recorded on seismometers. Do you believe 1.5 >> million *tons* of steel and concrete just starts dropping >> immediately? The inertia of that much mass, combined with the >> supporting column still supporting some of the weight (despite it >> being weakened by the fire) means the building took a bit to get >> moving. It didn't start falling until 3:52, meaning your "12 >> seconds" calculation was off by two seconds, necessitating your >> "buried nukes" be buried even *deeper* (1/6th deeper) than the >> 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* (it would be 43.493 to 113.085 miles) >> below the WTC towers (a depth we can't even drill to today, let >> alone in 1968). LOL >> >> Besides, just how is anything supposed to survive the heat at >> that depth? The *reason* we can't drill much deeper than the >> 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar is because it >> gets so fucking hot things start *melting* down there. >> >> Which means your "12 seconds" calculation is completely off. >> Little wonder, your entire grasping-at-straws conspiracy theory >> is completely off. >> >> Kook. LOL Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? Why aren't you explaining just exactly how it is that three holes were dug in 1968 that are deeper than we have the technology to dig to today, Ko0k? Why aren't you explaining just exactly how those bombs were supposed to sit there for 33 years, their neutron-source triggers naturally decaying the whole time, building up the decay byproduct xenon (a neutron absorber) and still have those triggers be viable enough after massive xenon poisoning to have the neutron flux to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction, Ko0k? Why aren't you explaining why a video from *inside* *one* *of* *the* *towers* *as* *it* *was* *collapsing* showed very clearly the heavy vibration from the central support column buckling, but the camera displayed *no* video distortion... if *any* camera were going to be affected by a supposed nuke EMP, it'd be *that* camera. ====================================================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. Even a small (1 kt) nuke would have *fried* that camera via EMP. ====================================================== Kook. LOL > Damn you have turned into a nitpicker just like Jim. > > So that was satellite interference caused by an EMP. Are you happy now? Except I've provided a link to a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*... the heavy vibrations from the central column buckling were clearly visible in the video, and there was *no* EMP that disrupted the camera... that camera was at "Ground Zero"... if *any* camera was going to be destroyed by a nuke EMP, it'd be that one... yet there wasn't even a tiny glitch in the video, and the camera remained in operation throughout the entire collapse. ====================================================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================================================== This *one* piece of evidence proves your kook blather wrong... add in the fact that I've used seven *other* vectors to prove your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics and it all adds up to one incontrovertible fact... that you're an uneducated and thoroughly dimwitted idiot who is simply too stupid to comprehend how wrong you are. Kook. LOL >> It happens from time to time. > Especially when there is an EMP in the area. DUH. No, it's usually a result of too many people trying to uplink at the same time, and sometimes because one of them is trying to "jump the line" and get priority access. If you knew *anything* about how satellite uplinks work, you'd realize how ridiculous you're making yourself look. Of course, the fact that the video shows a multi-second disruption also points to the fact that its source could *not* be a nuclear EMP, because nuclear weapons explode in a timeframe of nanoseconds... their EMP is very short and of very high intensity. Thus, if it had been a nuclear EMP, the last thing you would have seen from that camera would have been the EMP... after that, the camera electronics would have burned out. A nuke EMP most certainly would *not* have caused a multi-second disruption of the video (remember, nuclear EMPs are short, sharp spikes), and it most certainly *would* *have* burned out the camera's electronics. Kook. LOL > Besides nobody ever proved WCBS used Satellite but they have proven they use > AM instead of FM. But then again that was obvious since we might not have > noticed the affects of an EMP if they used FM. Nearly ALL remote news crews now use satellite feed. The alternative, hooking up to the internet to feed to the station's servers, often isn't an option, or is an inconvenient option. The other alternative, microwave transmission, is even less of a convenient option due to line-of-sight issues. The other alternative, satellite phone, is even less of a convenient option due to limited bandwidth and grainy picture. The above facts are especially true for news crews that don't have a station in the immediate vicinity, as often happens during large crises. Educate yourself, Ko0k: <http://www.ieee.li/pdf/viewgraphs/fundamentals_satellite_communication_part_3.pdf> > Rocky Kook. LOL -- Kadaitcha Man (aka HalfADickRick Mather) is an AUK veteran from way back. He was actually stupid enough to try to hook up with that AUK pass-around girl Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries (aka Rhonda Russo), but ended up booting her to the curb because she's just a cunt hair away from being that nucking futs cat lady dragging a folding cart filled with recyclables so she can afford to buy cat food for herself and her dozen cats. He dodged a bullet, given that she now looks like a reject from a zombie slasher flick, has cancer, hypothyroidism, bulging neck goiters, rotting gums, missing teeth, thinning hair, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Autism and is just plumb nutz. HalfADickRick lost his better half in a motorcycle accident, so even if he had hooked up with Rhondumb, he'd have to get a surrogate to bed her. He's got growling menacingly down to a science, but toothless old dogs have had plenty of time to practice. He has first-hand experience with gaiety, given that his oldest son wasn't raised right and turned out to be light in the loafers... which limits HalfADickRick's trolling abilities and precludes him laughing at the sissies. So he lost half his dick *and* now has no balls for trolling. "Big things are made out of little things." HalfADickRick Mather's Grand Unified Theory of the Universe. Message-ID: <d7419da693ffc53a544d5e1569ac9bfc@dizum.com> "all matter appeared simultaneously in all places at once (i.e. everywhere at the same time)" Delusional fuckwit HalfADickRick denying nucleosynthesis, nuclear transmutation, universal expansion, hydrogen consisting of most universal mass, cosmic background radiation, 21 cm radiation, the very means by which matter came to be formed from energy after the big bang, and most importantly, reality. Message-ID: <9eb660cc06ece30da6a8e7a947a65dfb@dizum.com> HalfADickRick believes these two statements mean the same thing... he's too stupid to realize the contradiction within the statements: 1) "When you touch something, you don't actually touch it because the negative charge of the electrons in all matter repel each other." 2) "everything you experience is experienced only within your consciousness. That is, there is no reality apart from consciousness." MID: <269e51973939871be9eeaaef420f8a6c@dizum.com> "Who said it's your eyes that see?" HalfADickRick, yet again displaying his unfathomable stupidity. "The Turing test is overrated anyway." HalfADickRick, mad because he's too stupid to pass the Turing test. "The now you experience now simply moves to this now." HalfADickRick's excuse for living in the past. Message-ID: <2e6f960b0b8c4a738b1116b41865cb35@dizum.com> HalfADickRick projects what he thinks of himself: "A fairyboy with an inadequate penis." Message-ID: <d4e79c0adde0074ee812eba8d9023f97@dizum.com> HalfADickRick tried blaming his own screediness on a Visual Basic bot he programmed, k'laming it's artificially intelligent and able to hold contextually-relevant conversations without any assistance... when challenged to put Fred Tehbot to work producing 5000 intelligent and contextually relevant replies per day to random posts, an easy task for a machine, HalfADickRick started backpedaling, evading and hurling insults. In actuality, he was assisting his tardbot by screeding right alongside it to lend it the appearance of intelligence (but only the appearance, because HalfADickRick's pretty retarded LOL). Spanked to tears yet again by reality, he plonked and ran away, tears streaming, fright-piss flowing, a plaintive "WHHHHAAAAAAA!" issuing from his otherwise-dumbstruck mouth. <snicker>
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 07:46 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:26 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:55 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-16 09:50 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:21 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:22 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:39 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:47 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:12 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:34 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 21:17 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 18:35 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 04:19 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 22:04 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:24 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 20:41 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:56 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 20:56 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 03:43 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 23:28 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:26 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:20 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 10:28 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:37 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:41 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-17 08:04 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( Checkmated checkmate ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:26 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( Checkmated checkmate ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:43 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:43 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:46 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 08:09 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE Perimeter Walls ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 06:48 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE Perimeter Walls ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 17:05 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE credentials ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:23 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE credentials ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 19:27 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE is a complete idiot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:45 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE is a complete idiot ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:00 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 11:17 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:10 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-18 14:27 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 18:37 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 10:34 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 16:35 +0100
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 18:14 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:53 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 17:33 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-20 00:07 +0100
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-21 14:15 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-21 19:55 +0100
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:05 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:17 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 21:31 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-21 23:51 +0100
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 23:07 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-18 15:07 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfolery ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 18:07 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfolery ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 23:28 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfolery ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-19 08:25 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfolery ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:55 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfolery ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfoolery ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 09:21 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfoolery ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:57 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-19 08:07 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 08:25 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-19 09:46 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 09:15 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 16:37 +0100
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:59 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 14:11 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-19 19:51 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:06 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 04:16 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 08:32 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 17:35 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:36 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:58 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:17 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 23:00 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:40 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 07:22 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 07:05 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:17 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... (laughing at FNVWE) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:14 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... (laughing at FNVWE) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 21:17 +0200
csiph-web