Re: It's About Time

Newsgroups	sci.physics
Date	2015-07-25 13:28 -0700
References	(2 earlier) <55AF0AFD.500F@ix.netcom.com> <moqqa8$kk5$2@speranza.aioe.org> <55B13281.4B7C@ix.netcom.com> <64326da0-d50c-4926-8f5d-ec1b34e3cc34@googlegroups.com> <G9Csx.284579$GA1.228108@fx19.iad>
Message-ID	<75604b2d-1be9-4f84-aaf6-e452571fd694@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: It's About Time
From	Double-A <double-a3@hush.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Friday, July 24, 2015 at 7:05:29 PM UTC-7, benj wrote:
> On 07/24/2015 12:23 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 11:29:27 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> >> Simeom wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 7/21/2015 10:16 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>> Simeom wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 7/21/2015 7:41 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>> Now let me explain
> >>>>>> how this Clock thing
> >>>>>> works...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> OK !!  I am READY !!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If you got two
> >>>>>> clocks, and one is
> >>>>>> slower
> >>>>>> and the other
> >>>>>> is faster....
> >>>
> >>>>> usally a small speed adjustment is all that is needed, perhaps both
> >>>>> clocks, get a short wave radio and tune to 10MHz and listen for the
> >>>>> ticking, no problem
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> the one that is faster
> >>>>>> is in the future...
> >>>>>> and the other one
> >>>>>> is running slow because
> >>>>>> it's in the past.
> >>>
> >>>>> can you see the one in the future, or will someone move it ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> can you see the one in the past? or is it gone ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The clock in the north
> >>>>>> pole is the future clock..
> >>>>>> and the clock in the south
> >>>>>> is the clock in the past.
> >>>
> >>>>> south pole ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> both those places are very cold, and if your clocks are pendulem types
> >>>>> they may still be off due to being at the pole and rotating around.
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>>>> If you're standing
> >>>>>> on the north pole..
> >>>>>> and your twin is in
> >>>>>> the south pole...
> >>>>>> your twin at the
> >>>>>> north pole is
> >>>>>> getting older
> >>>>>> faster than your
> >>>>>> twin in the
> >>>>>> south pole.
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> na, one at the pole and the other at the Equator, the equator rotates at
> >>>>> 24,901 miles in 24 hours or about 1,000 miles an hour relitive to the
> >>>>> pole, so the equator dudes are younger than pole dudes.  which is easily
> >>>>> verified as the pole only has older people there, and the equator has
> >>>>> lots of babies in new countries....
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>> the south pole is the bottom..
> >>>> the north pole it the top.
> >>>>
> >>>> elevation.
> >>>
> >>>> think
> >>>> east west
> >>>> this way and that way
> >>>> also called longitude
> >>>>
> >>>> then
> >>>>    altitude
> >>>> south pole level
> >>>> and north pole at the top.
> >>>
> >>>> north points up.
> >>>>
> >>>> up.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> if you are at the south pole and they tell you to look up, do you look
> >>> at your feet, or do you look at the sky ?
> >>
> >>
> >> I have a question for You...
> >>
> >>
> >>   You got a mechanical clock at the north pole, with a guy looking at it
> >>
> >>   And you got a mechanical clock at the equator, with a girl looking at it
> >>
> >>   Of course, the clock runs a little slower at the equator..
> >>
> >>   but the question is...
> >>
> >>   When does it run slower? In the summertime? Winter time? Spring, or Fall??? Or
> >>   in the mornings, or in the afternoon, or evenings. When does it run slower????
> >>
> >>   Or does it run slower when she keeps looking at the clock all the time,
> >>   no matter what time of day it is or what month it is..
> >>   comparison to the clock at the north pole where the guy is looking at it?
> >>
> >>   The question is: When does the clock run slower?
> >
> > Clock runs slower at N.pole. A 199 lb man weighs 200lb at the north pole. Get the picture. TreBert
> >
> Depends on the kind of clock. Get the picture?


Of course.  I've always said that different kinds of clocks keep different times in different circumstances.  

Double-A

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: It's About Time Simeom <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-23 08:30 -0500
  Re: It's About Time The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-23 11:15 -0700
  Re: It's About Time The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-23 11:29 -0700
    Re: It's About Time The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:58 -0700
      Re: It's About Time The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 00:17 -0700
    Re: It's About Time benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 22:05 -0400
      Re: It's About Time Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-07-25 13:28 -0700

csiph-web