Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #39966
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Loop optimisation. |
| Date | 2021-04-17 21:45 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <7236162.EvYhyI6sBW@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <7904310.T7Z3S40VBb@PointedEars.de> <1110f942-cc14-45b2-966b-a4442461f170n@googlegroups.com> <9878253.nUPlyArG6x@PointedEars.de> <2144986.iZASKD2KPV@PointedEars.de> <8568ec13-3f65-4b1d-b9b3-decd9eacebe3n@googlegroups.com> |
Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote: > On Wednesday, April 14, 2021 at 11:00:26 AM UTC-5, Thomas 'PointedEars' > Lahn wrote: >> This should clarify your misconception: >> >> <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/SpiderMonkey/Internals/Bytecodes> > > Yes, I'm aware as mentioned in my last response. I don't think we > disagree. I think we do. You still appear to think that “JIT” is something new. It isn’t: > What the modern "JIT"s do is different than what the original > interpreters were accomplishing. As mentioned in Brendan's original post > on TraceMonkey they enabled the ability to dynamically go from the > interpreted byte code to more low-level forms including machine code with > direct register access. As I already said, this has happened *from the beginning*, since the very first version of SpiderMonkey in Netscape Navigator. TraceMonkey only *improves* that. >> Since this is actually *compilation* (conversion of human-readable source >> code to machine-readable code), that part of the “interpreter” is >> actually technically a _compiler_. > > A "compiler" does not execute code, its role is to perform translation. You don’t say. Will you *please* learn to read more carefully? :-( -- PointedEars FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> <https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Loop optimisation. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-10 18:41 +0100
Re: Loop optimisation. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-04-10 19:14 +0100
Re: Loop optimisation. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-11 11:33 +0100
Re: Loop optimisation. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-04-11 15:03 +0100
Re: Loop optimisation. "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-04-11 07:38 -0700
Re: Loop optimisation. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-04-11 13:36 -0700
Re: Loop optimisation. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-04-12 18:05 +0100
Re: Loop optimisation. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-12 23:16 +0100
Re: Loop optimisation. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2021-04-13 05:19 -0700
Re: Loop optimisation. "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-04-13 06:21 -0700
Re: Loop optimisation. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-12 01:36 +0100
Re: Loop optimisation. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-04-12 18:04 +0100
Re: Loop optimisation. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-12 23:09 +0100
Re: Loop optimisation. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-04-13 20:08 +0100
Re: Loop optimisation. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-13 21:41 +0100
Re: Loop optimisation. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2021-04-14 18:24 +0100
Re: Loop optimisation. Kristjan Robam <he12457@hotmail.com> - 2021-04-10 13:36 -0700
Re: Loop optimisation. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-11 11:34 +0100
Re: Loop optimisation. "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-04-10 22:22 -0700
Re: Loop optimisation. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-11 11:36 +0100
Re: Loop optimisation. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-04-14 02:20 +0200
Re: Loop optimisation. "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-04-14 06:48 -0700
Re: Loop optimisation. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-04-14 17:31 +0200
Re: Loop optimisation. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-04-14 18:00 +0200
Re: Loop optimisation. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-14 19:25 +0100
Re: Loop optimisation. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-04-14 23:10 +0200
Re: Loop optimisation. "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-04-17 09:45 -0700
Re: Loop optimisation. "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-04-17 09:43 -0700
Re: Loop optimisation. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2021-04-17 21:45 +0200
Re: Loop optimisation. Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2021-04-18 19:06 -0700
Re: Loop optimisation. "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2021-04-17 08:50 -0700
csiph-web