Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #529793
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-01 15:14 -0800 |
| References | (6 earlier) <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.28{0.22A.Seattle.2015}> <Y1HYx.22357$bG2.14757@fx26.iad> <pan.2015.10.30.18.51.27@localhost.localdomain> <3750669f-c51d-4195-b3b1-4fbaa76b5060@googlegroups.com> <pan.2015.10.30.22.36.22@localhost.localdomain> |
| Message-ID | <70378438-4fc0-4c55-b375-e28f882a3faa@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: The pseudo_random array is fully known, 100.0000% predictable. |
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 3:37:33 PM UTC-7, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:08:41 -0700, noTthaTguY wrote: > > > how do you call one of two players, > > tossing three coins at once. easier: > > tossing two coins at once > > Two heads are better than one. > > But three is perfection. Random can go with chaos. Relate to uncertainty principle Going in in diamensions
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Better Randomness ? ! Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-10-27 22:41 -0700
Re: Better Randomness ? ! Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2015-10-27 22:46 -0700
Re: Better Randomness ? ! Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-28 06:50 +0000
Re: The pseudo_random array is fully known, 100.0000% predictable. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-28 17:34 +0000
Re: The pseudo_random array is fully known, 100.0000% predictable. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 05:48 -0400
Re: The pseudo_random array is fully known, 100.0000% predictable. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-30 18:53 +0000
Re: The pseudo_random array is fully known, 100.0000% predictable. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 14:08 -0700
Re: The pseudo_random array is fully known, 100.0000% predictable. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-30 22:36 +0000
Re: The pseudo_random array is fully known, 100.0000% predictable. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 15:14 -0800
Re: Better Randomness ? ! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-28 14:33 +0000
Re: Better Randomness ? ! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-28 09:36 -0500
Re: Better Randomness ? ! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 05:56 -0400
Re: Better Randomness ? ! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-10-28 10:46 -0400
QueryPerformanceCounter() -- Better Randomness. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-10-28 08:28 -0700
Re: QueryPerformanceCounter() -- Better Randomness. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-10-28 11:48 -0400
RDRAND has numerous problems. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-10-28 09:35 -0700
Re: QueryPerformanceCounter() -- Better Randomness. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-28 16:17 +0000
QueryPerformanceCounter() -- Better Randomness. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-10-28 09:50 -0700
Re: QueryPerformanceCounter() -- Better Randomness. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-28 17:44 +0000
Re: QueryPerformanceCounter() -- Better Randomness. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-28 18:01 +0000
Re: QueryPerformanceCounter() -- Better Randomness. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-28 18:39 +0000
Re: Better Randomness ? ! Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-10-29 19:38 +0100
Re: Better Randomness ? ! Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-10-29 19:14 +0000
Re: Better Randomness ? ! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-29 13:10 -0700
Re: Better Randomness ? ! Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-29 21:36 +0000
Re: Better Randomness ? ! noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 17:24 -0700
Re: Better Randomness ? ! benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 21:55 -0400
Re: Better Randomness ? ! Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-30 02:12 +0000
Re: Better Randomness ? ! Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-30 02:18 +0000
Re: Better Randomness ? ! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 05:45 -0400
csiph-web