Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #94822

Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV

Show all headers | View raw

Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> wrote:
> Can anyone offer more insight into this issue?
> 
> Basically, which compiler is truly "better?"

All I know is that libllvm is _huge_ and I've worked hard to avoid
installing it on systems that I try to keep small. That sort of
bloat really annoys me.

According to these speed benchmarks of different libraries built
with GCC and Clang, they're about evenly matched overall, but in
some specific cases one can be significantly faster than the other:

https://www.phoronix.com/review/gcc-16-vs-clang-22

-- 
__          __
#_ < |\| |< _#

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-10-31 03:11 +0000
  Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2026-10-31 17:28 +1000
    Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-10-31 13:25 +0000
  Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2026-10-31 10:30 -0400
    Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-10-31 15:12 +0000
    Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-31 19:21 +0000
    Re: GCC vs. LLVM Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-10-31 21:06 +0000

csiph-web