Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > news.admin.peering > #3524
| From | noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> |
|---|---|
| Subject | OT Re: Amateur Peering |
| Newsgroups | news.admin.peering |
| References | <118h2k4$epu4$1@dont-email.me> <20260918124427.0a75eb85@wibble.sysadmininc.com> |
| Message-ID | <6aade2c8$1@news.ausics.net> (permalink) |
| Date | 2026-09-19 11:18 +1000 |
| Organization | Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net |
On Fri, 18 Sep 2026 12:44:27 -0500, Nigel Reed wrote: > Are you only gating fidonet groups that specifically allow gating? Many > expressly forbid it, or only allow with mod approval. Some are already > gated. Fido's rules are and always have been archaic, I ran a BBS back in late 80s/90's (Ezycom under DOS/Desqview/Qemm) and i think it was 91 or 92 added this new thing called "the internet" with tcp trumpet sock or something similarly named to allow logins - back then it more of a play thing since Peter said Ezycom update facilitates it, boy those were the days we had compuserve on a super blazingly fast best-thing-to-ever- happen 2400bps modem line :) the zone "kommandant" regulary objected to us allowing logins - on the internet line, whilst the other dialup line was always in its hourly reserved netmail hour (4-5AM here), I argued with the kommandant for several weeks on why I should lock everyone out when the dedicated dialup was complying, I fulfilled my netmail obligations keeping the dialup free, he knows that because our "discussion" was all via netmail :) he cut me off 3 times over period of a year for that until he moved to terminate my node altogether. I then got a direct (IIRC called a point node) arrangement from John (everybody knows John in Zone 1, also went on to run a fair size ISP in the US from what I heard in later years) I had all my feeds and netmail from him via the internet (until I closed the BBS in late 90's - it ran for about 12 years all up). Over the following 2 or 3 years, my story was repeated several times over by other BBS's here, but they just ended Fidonet rather than seeking other access. Some people insist in living in the stone ages, and Fido doesnt seem to have realised its own policies are whats seen its demise, like this, forbidden to gate areas, thats right forbid them, heaven forbid people discover Fidonet by finding their discussions on usenet, not advertise and prevent others discovering them - not that I can imagine there being many in 2026 anyway but I confess to not giving a damn enough to go looking :)
Back to news.admin.peering | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Amateur Peering IntraNIC <intranicnetwork@gmail.com> - 2026-09-17 08:54 -0700
Re: Amateur Peering "Roberto CORRADO" <i@secure.corradoroberto.it> - 2026-09-17 18:32 +0200
Re: Amateur Peering IntraNIC <intranicnetwork@gmail.com> - 2026-09-17 09:41 -0700
Re: Amateur Peering "Roberto CORRADO" <i@secure.corradoroberto.it> - 2026-09-18 20:52 +0200
Re: Amateur Peering Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> - 2026-09-17 21:02 +0200
Re: Amateur Peering Madison <madison.brooks@skeetchestn.ca> - 2026-09-17 13:47 -0700
Re: Amateur Peering Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> - 2026-09-17 23:29 +0200
Re: Amateur Peering Madison <madison.brooks@skeetchestn.ca> - 2026-09-17 14:48 -0700
Re: Amateur Peering Nigel Reed <sysop@endofthelinebbs.com> - 2026-09-18 12:58 -0500
Re: Amateur Peering IntraNIC <intranicnetwork@gmail.com> - 2026-09-19 18:09 -0700
Re: Amateur Peering noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> - 2026-09-20 11:28 +1000
Re: Amateur Peering Nigel Reed <sysop@endofthelinebbs.com> - 2026-09-18 12:44 -0500
Re: Amateur Peering "IntraNIC intranicnetwork"@gmail.com - 2026-09-18 10:47 -0700
OT Re: Amateur Peering noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> - 2026-09-19 11:18 +1000
Re: OT Re: Amateur Peering Fae Empress <admin@mail.su.gy> - 2026-09-19 15:51 -0700
Re: OT Re: Amateur Peering noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> - 2026-09-20 11:17 +1000
csiph-web