Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #135137
| Date | 2026-06-07 12:29 +1000 |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: ANN: DX-Forth 4.64 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| References | <6a13dee7$1@news.ausics.net> <1101b6r$1t9ia$1@dont-email.me> |
| From | dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> |
| Message-ID | <6a24d790$1@news.ausics.net> (permalink) |
| Organization | Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net |
On 7/06/2026 12:35 am, Hans Bezemer wrote: > On 25-05-2026 07:32, dxf wrote: >> + -CHAR ?FREE >> + Key codes (KEYS.SCR) >> + Quad number package (QUAD.SCR) >> + Double number package (DOUBLE.SCR) >> + Floating point locals (FLOCALS.SCR) >> + Forth Inc punctuation (PUNCT.SCR) > > I bet your "END" equals my ";THEN" (aka "THEN EXIT")? If you mean "EXIT THEN" then yes :) I've had END for about 10 years ago and it's been used a lot. Moore realized most use of 'ELSE' was in fact redundant - why branch to the end of a definition when one can simply EXIT? While 'EXIT THEN' has been around forever and one sees it used occasionally, it's a bit of a mouthful. I chose the name 'END' as a) it fits and b) it hadn't been used in forth since the mid/late 70's. END was the original name for UNTIL .
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
ANN: DX-Forth 4.64 dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-05-25 15:32 +1000
Re: ANN: DX-Forth 4.64 Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 16:35 +0200
Re: ANN: DX-Forth 4.64 dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 12:29 +1000
Re: ANN: DX-Forth 4.64 Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 14:14 +0200
Re: ANN: DX-Forth 4.64 dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 12:59 +1000
csiph-web